Energy Central EnergyPulse Home
Home Subscribe Login Contribute to Energy Pulse Advertise on Energy Pulse About Energy Pulse Feedback to Energy Pulse
Search Articles:   
  You are here: Home > Wind > Article Display


Free Newsletter
Sign up today for your free subscription to the EnergyPulse Weekly Update - delivered directly to your e-mail box.
e-mail:


 

Communicating Smart Meter Value

Sep 9 2010 - 2010-01-01 12:00:00 - Your City

If you are involved in Management or Customer Service and are responsible for communicating the value of smart meters to your utility customers, you don’t want to miss this online discussion - Communicating Smart Meter Value.  more...

Social Media: The new frontier in recruiting, communications and marketing

Sep 13 2010 - 2010-01-01 12:00:00 - Your City

Join social media mavens Matthew Burks and Amanda Shewmake as they provide an insider's perspective on how HR, communications and marketing professionals in energy companies can harness the power of social media to be more effective and productive. more...

Eliminating Obstacles and Delivering the Benefits of the Smart Grid - IBM's Optimized Energy Value Chain (OEVC)

Sep 14 2010 - 2010-01-01 12:00:00 - Your City

The convergence of power and information technologies in the smart grid has created opportunities for finer grained and broader controls of energy flows. These opportunities can improve electric service in multiple dimensions: lower cost, greater reliability, greater customer satisfaction, and more...

Achieving Operational Excellence - What to Consider Before Implementing or Upgrading Your Distribution Management Solutions

Sep 16 2010 - 2010-01-01 12:00:00 - Your City

Significant cost over runs. Changing business requirements. A well thought out plan is essential. Attend this free webcast discussion to hear inside hear three experts in utility operations discuss what utilities need to evaluate when they are considering upgrading or more...

Outsmarting the Smart Grid: IT, Security and Communication Infrastructure  Challenges & Opportunities for Utilities

Sep 21 2010 - 2010-01-01 12:00:00 - Your City

The smart grid is shifting the playing field for utilities. And when the game changes, it pays to be prepared. A nimble solutions partner can help you design the solutions that keep operations on track, even as new challenges come more...

1st CSP Today Concentrated Solar Thermal Power Summit India

Sep 7 2010 - Sep 8 2010 - New Delhi India

Deliver a profitable, productive and commercially successful large scale CSP business in India. Building on the success of past events in USA, Europe & MENA, CSP Today brings to New Delhi the most relevant international experience for the concentrated solar more...

Offshore Wind Energy in North America's Great Lakes Conference

Sep 9 2010 - Sep 10 2010 - Toronto

Two day conference that tackles the most important challenges. A blend of European knowledge from the companies who have been installing offshore wind turbines for the last decade alongside local state governing bodies and leading project developers. Permitting, securing long more...

Autovation 2010

Sep 12 2010 - Sep 15 2010 - Austin, TX - USA

Autovation 2010 is a not-to-miss educational forum that will attract utility executives from around the world looking for new ways to optimize their operations through automation technologies. more...

Global Sustainable Bioenergy North American Convention

Sep 14 2010 - Sep 16 2010 - Minneapolis, MN - USA

The North American convention provides a remarkable opportunity to play a part in guiding renewable energy policy for the 21st century. Attendees will create a resolution that, along with similar resolutions already drafted on four other continents, will help set more...

GridWise Global Forum

Sep 21 2010 - Sep 23 2010 - Washington, DC - USA

Hosted by the GridWise(R) Alliance and the U.S. Department of Energy, the GridWise Global Forum will convene thought leaders from the highest levels of government, business, NGOS, and academia from around the world to discuss the ultimate enabling potential of more...

1. Intro to Nat Gas Trading & Hedging 2. Option Applications in Energy

Sep 20 2010 - Sep 23 2010 - Houston, TX - USA

Introduction to Natural Gas Trading & Hedging - This program provides a comprehensive understanding of the structures that underlie Natural Gas trading. Beyond Essentials: Option Applications in Energy - This course provides a solid practical and conceptual (non-quantitative) understanding of more...

Electric Business Understanding Seminar

Sep 20 2010 - Sep 21 2010 - Houston, TX - USA

Electric Business Understanding provides a comprehensive overview of the electric industry. Position yourself for career advancement by gaining a solid understanding of how the electric business works including key physical, market, and regulatory aspects and how market participants navigate this more...

Electric Market Dynamics Seminar

Sep 22 2010 - Sep 23 2010 - Houston, TX - USA

Electric Market Dynamics offers participants an in-depth understanding of North American electric markets and how they function. Enhance your career by furthering your knowledge of market structures, pricing mechanisms, services offered in markets, and how various participants use the markets more...

Gas and Electric Business Understanding Seminar

Oct 5 2010 - Oct 6 2010 - Los Angeles, CA - USA

Gas and Electric Business Understanding provides a comprehensive overview of the natural gas and electric industries. Position yourself for career success by gaining a solid understanding of how each business works, including key physical, market and regulatory aspects, as well more...

Energy Central
Power Network




Wind


We know you have something to say!
There is an immediate need for articles on the hot topics in the Power Industry! EnergyPulse, like no other publication, also provides a means for our readers to immediately interact with experts like you.
 
Contribute Today!
Please view our Author Guidelines and send submissions to the editor.

Click For More Articles on Wind
 
Creative Financing Structures Provide Breath of Fresh Air for Wind Power Projects
2.3.05   Nandan Nelivigi, Partner, White & Case LLP

Article Viewed 7844 Times
4 Comments
E-mail Article Printer Friendly
 
  • Email This Author
  • Comment On Article
  • About The Author
  • More Articles By This Author

    Interested in this topic? Need more information? Energy Central has created a complete information service focused only on Wind Energy. There is no better way to stay informed. Get more information on Wind Energy today!
    After wind power projects ground to a near halt in early 2004, expect a surge of activity among U.S. developers now that Congress has renewed through December 2005 the federal production tax credit, which currently provides a 1.8 cent-per-kilowatt-hour tax credit for energy generated by wind or certain other renewable sources. The bulk of development activity will occur early in 2005 in order to ensure that the wind turbines are placed in service before January 1, 2006, as required to qualify for the federal tax credits. From the date a wind turbine is placed in service, it becomes eligible for such tax credits for 10 years.

    In October a new law was enacted that extended a number of expiring business tax credits, including the production tax credits under Section 45 of the Tax Code that are vital to wind power project financings and have been anticipated by the market all year. Analysts predict new installations will likely exceed 2,500 megawatts (MW) in 2005. By contrast, because of the uncertainty created by Congressional delay in renewing the tax credit, less than 500MW of new capacity was installed in 2004. The push for new wind capacity is being further supported by efforts at the state level. A number of states have mandated under their renewable portfolio standards (RPS) that a specified percentage of the electricity supplied to customers be generated from renewable sources, including wind. For example, the RPS in New York requires that the renewable sources constitute 25 percent by 2013; California requires 20 percent renewable sources by 2017.

    Role of Production Tax Credits in Financing Wind Projects

    To maximize the advantages that the production tax credit offers, however, requires a closer look at how wind power facilities are financed. Unlike most power projects which are financed based on their revenues from power sales, financing for wind power projects depends heavily on the production tax credits. The 1.8-cent-per-kilowatt-hour tax credit could account for as much as half of a wind farm's economics. However, the availability of the tax credits itself does not translate into cash flow, which is essential to service the debt incurred to finance a wind farm. Tax credits are useful only if they can be used to reduce federal tax liability. Entities that own wind farms are typically structured as pass-through entities (like partnerships and limited-liability companies) that do not have federal income tax liability in addition to and separate from the tax liability of the equity owners of such entities.

    T

    herefore, in order to monetize the tax savings resulting from the production tax credits, project finance lenders require the equity owners to contribute cash to the project entity in the same amount as the tax savings resulting from the production tax credits. While there are various ways to structure such cash contributions, no matter what the form, the lenders will want to ensure that the equity owners have the ability to contribute the cash attributable to savings from the production tax credits. The lenders will require these contributions whether or not the tax credits continue to be available under the tax code or can be utilized by the equity owners during the 10-year period after the wind turbines become eligible for the credits. However, the credits are only available for energy that is actually generated, so the lenders take the risk of insufficient wind or mechanical failure because the equity investor is not required to contribute cash under those circumstances.

    Small Wind Developers Can Maximize Benefits by Teaming Up with Other Investors

    This requirement of the lenders presents an obvious problem in financing wind farms developed by small wind developers which may not be able to use the production tax credits or may not have a credit that is acceptable to project finance lenders. One increasingly popular financing structure addresses this problem by creating a mechanism for the wind developer to share the economics of the project with a tax-oriented investor who can make use of the production tax credits and provide the credit strength that lenders value. This structure will need to be designed carefully to comply with federal income tax rules, including, in particular, the regulations applicable to special allocations of income, deductions and tax credits.

    However, pure tax-oriented investors have no appetite for risk during the construction period when the wind turbines are not yet eligible for the production tax credits. That puts the burden on the small developers to find the financing necessary to see the construction through to completion. There are a number of lenders in the market which are willing to provide construction financing or bridge financing, which will either get converted into term financing or refinanced upon completion of construction.

    Bond Markets Favor Wind Farm Portfolios

    Institutional buyers in the bond market have also become comfortable in financing wind farms based on a combination of revenues from power sales and production tax credits. However, institutional buyers, like the tax oriented investors, also have little appetite for construction risks. Projects likely to be successful in finding financing either in the institutional bond or private placement markets are those that are fully built and operational, and preferably that are pooled together into a portfolio of several wind farms. A portfolio of wind farms has the added advantage of built-in risk mitigation through diversification in terms of wind resource in different regions, different turbine technologies, different power offtakers and other factors.

    For example, in 2003 White & Case represented the underwriter in two portfolio bond financings of seven wind farms in six different locations in the United States. Large developers are likely to continue to take advantage of the pricing and the operational flexibility offered by the bond market.

    Clearly the stop-and-start approach Congress has taken so far by renewing the production tax credit for only short periods of time before letting it expire disrupts the evolution of wind power as a viable source of energy in the United States. While the better solution would be for Congress to extend the production tax credit over several years to provide industry stability, both lenders and wind power developers can realize a benefit now if they embrace flexibility in how projects are structured and if they act quickly to get wind farms online.

    For information on purchasing reprints of this article, contact Tim Tobeck ttobeck@energycentral.com.
    Copyright 2010 CyberTech, Inc.
     
    Contact The Author
    Email the author
    E-mail Article Printer Friendly
     
  • Click Here For More Articles on Wind


  • Click Here For More Articles By Nandan Nelivigi
  • Do you agree or disagree with this article? Send in your own article.

     

    Readers Comments

    Date Comment
    Tom Tanton
    2.8.05
    Various forms of tax credits and subsidies have been available for wind, now for almost 30 years--what is the expectation on when " the evolution of wind power as a viable source of energy in the United States" will ever be completed--or does the wind industry expect the taxpayer to finance them always?

    Bob Crowell
    2.8.05
    Mr. Tanton, in fact, most of the wind industry agrees that all energy tax subsidies should be eliminated, including natural gas, oil, coal and nuclear.

    Jatin Nathwani
    2.8.05
    A few observations. 1. If 50% of the "essential" economic case for a wind power project is tied to the Production Tax Credit (1.8cents/kWh), a lender might consider that a fairly high risk given the vagaries of political outcomes. What are the typical risk mitigation measures that "financial" folks have invoked to address the project risk? Do the equity investors hedge the risk by setting a very high IRR and what are the typical discount rates (>20%?)

    2. The output from a wind farm is of course sensitive to wind speed andthe forecast assumed for wind speeds. There are significant impacts on the the total production costs and only a 1.0m/s change in the actual from forecast wind regime can take a project from profitability to ruin. What are the creative strategies for managing such asymmetric risks inherent in the project financing of a wind project. Jatin Nathwani

    Glenn Schleede
    2.10.05
    I don't usually comment on Energy Pulse articles but I decided that a response I gave to someone in the financial world a couple years ago might add some perspective to this discussion. I usually label the letter "Money changing and Wealth transfers."

    I do recognize that those in the financial world probably don't care a whole lot about the adverse impact of subsidy driven government policies -- even if they do direct billions of dollars into low productive investments and heap more tax burden on ordinary taxpayers.

    Clearly the huge tax breaks for "wind enery" eem to be effective. I just saw an article from "Citizens for Tax Justice" that claims that the FPL Group (parent of FPL Energy -- which claims to be THE largest owner of wind generating capaicity in the US) pad NO FEDERAL INCOME TAX in 2002 or 2003 while having profit of some $2.2 billion. I don't know if the claim is true but it does seem reasonable in view of the huge TAX AVOIDANCE benefits of 5-year double declining balance accelerated depreciation (MACRS), the "bonus" deprection deduction available from 9/11/2001 through 2004, and the Wind Production Tax Credit.

    Great for FPL Shareholders and any of the money changers and recipients of wind industry campaign contributions. Condolences for ordinary taxpayers who get to pick up the tax burden, electric customers who pay the higher prices for electricity from wind, and children who and grandchildren who get to pay off the deficit.

    Glenn Schleede Round Hill, VA ********************************

    July 12, 2003 Mr. Tim MacDonald Senior Vice President Meridian Clean Fuels, LLC 1266 Furnace Brook Parkway Quincy, MA 02169

    Dear Mr. MacDonald: Thank you for your July 2, 2003, letter (copy attached): • Indicating that Meridian is in the business of brokering Section 29 and 45 tax credits, with plans to focus on the extensive tax credits available for wind energy, and • Asking that I help you understand the reasons why wind energy does not really have all the advantages that its supporters claim. In summary, I do not propose to help you because I believe: • Your letter is evidence that you have not done the objective research that would, if undertaken, reveal the answers you are asking me to provide. • Federal tax credits available under Sections 29 and 45 of the Internal Revenue Code often: • Encourage investments in projects that are undertaken for tax avoidance purposes rather than sound business reasons. • Distort private sector capital investments by directing capital to projects with little intrinsic merit. • Shift tax burden from highly profitable organizations to ordinary individuals. • Encourage investments in projects that help push up consumers’ electricity prices. • Result in damage to environmental, ecological, scenic and property values that has not been taken into account by lawmakers and regulators. • Are not in the national and public interest, despite the fact that they may be legal.

    Based on your letter, it appears that Meridian plans to serve as a “money changer” by using faulty federal and state tax law and tax policies for wind energy to aid in transferring wealth (hundreds of $ millions) from ordinary taxpayers and consumers to organizations with high profits that wish to avoid taxes.

    Such a role probably is quite legal. Whether helping to load more tax burden and high (regressive) electricity costs on ordinary citizens is morally acceptable is a separate consideration. My sympathies in this matter lie with the taxpayers, electric customers and citizens who would bear the economic burden as well as the cost of impaired environmental, ecological, scenic and property values resulting from “wind farms.” The magnitude and merits of energy tax breaks and subsidies

    Normally, I would be quite willing to help keep tax dollars from flowing to Washington where they are wasted with such abandon -- as illustrated by the hundreds of millions of tax dollars that flow through the US Department of Energy (DOE) each year. As you probably know, DOE and its predecessors have spent over $100 billion on “energy R&D” that has produced little that is technologically sound, economically competitive and environmentally acceptable. For example, DOE has spent hundreds of millions on wind energy R&D, often using the argument that this was an “investment” in technology that would give the US an advantage in world markets. However, some 90% of the wind turbine market is supplied by foreign companies. The dollars being spent for wind turbines imported for “wind farms” in the US are, like dollars for imported oil, a part of the US balance of payments deficit.

    My normal desire to keep tax dollars out of Washington does not extend to either:

    1. Unwarranted Section 29 and 45 tax credits which, demonstrably, are among the more wasteful and outrageous measures pushed through the Congress by various special interest groups. For example, you may be aware

    Add your comments:
    Please log in to leave a comment!

    Top

        Home | Register | Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | About Us | Feedback
       Copyright © 2002-2010, CyberTech, Inc. - All rights reserved. Read our Terms of Service.