Energy Central EnergyPulse Home
Home Subscribe Login Contribute to Energy Pulse Advertise on Energy Pulse About Energy Pulse Feedback to Energy Pulse
Search Articles:   
  You are here: Home > Fossil & Biomass > Article Display


Free Newsletter
Sign up today for your free subscription to the EnergyPulse Weekly Update - delivered directly to your e-mail box.
e-mail:


 

Communicating Smart Meter Value

Sep 9 2010 - 2010-01-01 12:00:00 - Your City

If you are involved in Management or Customer Service and are responsible for communicating the value of smart meters to your utility customers, you don’t want to miss this online discussion - Communicating Smart Meter Value.  more...

Social Media: The new frontier in recruiting, communications and marketing

Sep 13 2010 - 2010-01-01 12:00:00 - Your City

Join social media mavens Matthew Burks and Amanda Shewmake as they provide an insider's perspective on how HR, communications and marketing professionals in energy companies can harness the power of social media to be more effective and productive. more...

Eliminating Obstacles and Delivering the Benefits of the Smart Grid - IBM's Optimized Energy Value Chain (OEVC)

Sep 14 2010 - 2010-01-01 12:00:00 - Your City

The convergence of power and information technologies in the smart grid has created opportunities for finer grained and broader controls of energy flows. These opportunities can improve electric service in multiple dimensions: lower cost, greater reliability, greater customer satisfaction, and more...

Achieving Operational Excellence - What to Consider Before Implementing or Upgrading Your Distribution Management Solutions

Sep 16 2010 - 2010-01-01 12:00:00 - Your City

Significant cost over runs. Changing business requirements. A well thought out plan is essential. Attend this free webcast discussion to hear inside hear three experts in utility operations discuss what utilities need to evaluate when they are considering upgrading or more...

Outsmarting the Smart Grid: IT, Security and Communication Infrastructure  Challenges & Opportunities for Utilities

Sep 21 2010 - 2010-01-01 12:00:00 - Your City

The smart grid is shifting the playing field for utilities. And when the game changes, it pays to be prepared. A nimble solutions partner can help you design the solutions that keep operations on track, even as new challenges come more...

1st CSP Today Concentrated Solar Thermal Power Summit India

Sep 7 2010 - Sep 8 2010 - New Delhi India

Deliver a profitable, productive and commercially successful large scale CSP business in India. Building on the success of past events in USA, Europe & MENA, CSP Today brings to New Delhi the most relevant international experience for the concentrated solar more...

Offshore Wind Energy in North America's Great Lakes Conference

Sep 9 2010 - Sep 10 2010 - Toronto

Two day conference that tackles the most important challenges. A blend of European knowledge from the companies who have been installing offshore wind turbines for the last decade alongside local state governing bodies and leading project developers. Permitting, securing long more...

Autovation 2010

Sep 12 2010 - Sep 15 2010 - Austin, TX - USA

Autovation 2010 is a not-to-miss educational forum that will attract utility executives from around the world looking for new ways to optimize their operations through automation technologies. more...

Global Sustainable Bioenergy North American Convention

Sep 14 2010 - Sep 16 2010 - Minneapolis, MN - USA

The North American convention provides a remarkable opportunity to play a part in guiding renewable energy policy for the 21st century. Attendees will create a resolution that, along with similar resolutions already drafted on four other continents, will help set more...

GridWise Global Forum

Sep 21 2010 - Sep 23 2010 - Washington, DC - USA

Hosted by the GridWise(R) Alliance and the U.S. Department of Energy, the GridWise Global Forum will convene thought leaders from the highest levels of government, business, NGOS, and academia from around the world to discuss the ultimate enabling potential of more...

1. Intro to Nat Gas Trading & Hedging 2. Option Applications in Energy

Sep 20 2010 - Sep 23 2010 - Houston, TX - USA

Introduction to Natural Gas Trading & Hedging - This program provides a comprehensive understanding of the structures that underlie Natural Gas trading. Beyond Essentials: Option Applications in Energy - This course provides a solid practical and conceptual (non-quantitative) understanding of more...

Electric Business Understanding Seminar

Sep 20 2010 - Sep 21 2010 - Houston, TX - USA

Electric Business Understanding provides a comprehensive overview of the electric industry. Position yourself for career advancement by gaining a solid understanding of how the electric business works including key physical, market, and regulatory aspects and how market participants navigate this more...

Electric Market Dynamics Seminar

Sep 22 2010 - Sep 23 2010 - Houston, TX - USA

Electric Market Dynamics offers participants an in-depth understanding of North American electric markets and how they function. Enhance your career by furthering your knowledge of market structures, pricing mechanisms, services offered in markets, and how various participants use the markets more...

Gas and Electric Business Understanding Seminar

Oct 5 2010 - Oct 6 2010 - Los Angeles, CA - USA

Gas and Electric Business Understanding provides a comprehensive overview of the natural gas and electric industries. Position yourself for career success by gaining a solid understanding of how each business works, including key physical, market and regulatory aspects, as well more...

Energy Central
Power Network




Fossil & Biomass


We know you have something to say!
There is an immediate need for articles on the hot topics in the Power Industry! EnergyPulse, like no other publication, also provides a means for our readers to immediately interact with experts like you.
 
Contribute Today!
Please view our Author Guidelines and send submissions to the editor.

Click For More Articles on Fossil & Biomass
 
Waste Heat - the 'sleeping giant' of all energy
5.13.04   Gary Beck, Principal, Eco-Holdings LLC

Article Viewed 10843 Times
7 Comments
E-mail Article Printer Friendly
 
  • Email This Author
  • Comment On Article
  • About The Author
  • More Articles By This Author

    "Get your Free Energy!", "Zero Pollution Energy - Today Only!",. . . sometimes I feel like one of those 1950's sidewalk newspaper hawkers trying to get a busy executive's attention as they hustle right on by. Similar to claims for reading the WSJ, those who read the 'WHJ' (Waste Heat Journal) will not just make more money, they will make more money . . . forever.

    Free Energy
    Our contention is that well over 8.4 million megawatts of free energy is there for the taking, and we do not need invent brand new technology to get a very significant portion of it. That 8.4 million megawatts is based on the rough assumption that the global average thermal efficiency of 40% applied to the 'total world energy consumption of 14 terawatts for 2003' (‘and 30 to 60 terawatts by 2050' per Nobel prize winner Dr. Richard Smalley, Rice University, June 23 2003)

    Zero-Pollution energy
    This is true zero pollution, zero emissions, free energy. The fuel to create it is already paid for and consumed, and by definition we are only dealing with the waste heat that otherwise is lost up the stack. If applied in a blanket manner across future commercial onsite distributed energy systems, waste heat recovery also becomes a local pollution solution by reducing the total electrical demand through waste heat driven (non-electric) air conditioning production.

    Bigger than oil, coal, natural gas and nuclear…Combined
    In simple terms that means 60% of all world energy becomes waste heat. On this basis Waste Heat Energy is bigger than oil, coal, natural gas and nuclear - combined.

    Waste Heat recovery makes green energy greener
    Are you exempt if you are working with ‘green energy’, ‘renewable energy’, ‘biofuels’ or some developing ‘clean’ energy system like fuel cell power? A big No! Waste heat recovery and its reapplication will improve the thermal efficiency for almost all systems. While low temperature PEM fuels cells have been the rage, a recent recognition that much less expensive SOFC and PAFC Fuel cells can more than compete if offered in combined cycle mode. In this waste heat utilization mode they create low energy steam or hot water to be converted into refrigeration (through adsorption or absorption chillers). Some solar energy companies design heat collectors directly under the voltaic cells to provide electricity and adsorption refrigeration from the sun. Low grade heat geothermal systems are driving proven organic Rankine cycles to make power, or can use new cascading refrigeration cycles to produce both power and refrigeration. Reality check!
    I am probably underestimating the most recent (and quite costly) advances in gas turbine materials, combustion systems, and inlet chilling technologies. We can also argue the same for the new 3D twist steam turbine condensing section blade technologies. Though I am less familiar, I sure there are equal efficiencies improvements in lean burn reciprocating engines. So let’s assume a 20% efficiency increase over the current average efficiency position. This pushes the recovered waste heat potential down closer to 50%. So put us down for ‘only’ 7 million megawatts. Realistically, most locations are probably just too remote or too distributed to justify heat recovery. But Stirling heat engines have run been off cooking fires in rural Africa. Maybe the available recovery and conversion technology proves just too difficult, or just too costly to implement right now. Lastly, basic system efficiencies, such as steam being from 20% to 35% overall, will put a realistic lid on the amount of heat energy that can be converted. So in total let’s plan to recover only 1/10th of the total waste heat - or 5% of all energy consumed in 2003. So we are down to a ‘paltry’ 350,000 megawatts. At an avoided cost basis of $0.05 per kilowatt-hour this equals over $153 billion each year of free and non-polluting energy! Say that slowly
    ‘One-hundred-fifty-three-billion-dollars-per-year-of-zero-pollution-energy’. It is a bit hard to comprehend. Try it this way - the waste heat energy market could support 1000 companies each with an average annual revenue stream of over $150 million. What’s the catch?
    In today’s post ‘dot-com’ economy this is a fair question to ask. So is ‘Where are the strings’, and more specifically ‘Where are these companies?’ Well, the only catch is that heat energy recovery may not be actually branded as “Waste Heat”. Developments in this area may go under other more common or accepted industry names like ‘Cogeneration’, ‘CHP’, ‘Combined Cycle’ or ‘Trigeneration’. But “Waste Heat” is actually a more correct all encompassing term, since not all recovered heat energy will drive ‘Co’ or ‘Tri’ generation, or drive Combined cycle/heat & power systems. A key point is that since it is a bit hard to directly transport BTUs by wire (or by internet), some of the most interesting waste heat recovery technologies convert low grade heat directly into refrigeration for local consumption. Attached strings?
    Sorry, but they must be nano-strings cause I just can’t see them. It is inevitable that waste heat recovery will blossom as a de facto ‘industry’. This will probably happen well before we see profitable returns from simple cycle fuel cells, micro-turbines, and engines. And certainly decades before we could hope to ‘see’ any nano-scale energy systems (the holy grail of energy?). Waste Heat’s compelling arguments
    Waste heat energy recovery and conversion will grow due to its simple and compelling reasons. Waste Heat Energy is free. Waste Heat Energy has zero pollution. Waste Heat energy recovery is very profitable when using yesterday’s technologies for large systems, economical when using today’s technologies for medium systems, and will be justified using tomorrow’s systems on small distributed power systems.

    May you live in exciting times . . .
    We have all had enough of the wrong type of excitement recently. But maybe now it is time for engineers to lead industry towards a positively exciting time of zero-pollution-free-energy. This is only available now through the application of new waste heat technologies. How can an energy engineer not be excited? New organic Rankine cycle and cascading heat cycle energy systems are being quietly developed. Two hundred year old Stirling heat engine technologies are being dusted off, improved, and 'introduced' as cutting-edge. New adsorption and absorption heat-to-cold technologies are being rapidly installed within the high energy cost states. True technological leaps like thermo-acoustics (heat-to-sound-to-cold) are now happening in the research wings of universities, and in the garages of Edison-like inventor entrepreneurs, and some startup ventures.

    Even steam is back ‘in’
    The oldest and still the most prolific waste heat technology of them all, steam, is expanding its market downward through new smaller higher efficiency designs. The ‘Twin-Turbine’ (photo) from Kühnle Kopp and Kausch for 1 to 10 MW claims ‘multistage efficiency at single stage prices’ due to its low cost modular construction. Even smaller high speed direct generator drive steam turbine gensets are under beta testing by several companies who claim efficiencies of 70 to 80% for outputs below 200 kW.

    The hidden cost of doing nothing
    Waste heat recovery is the purest form of energy conservation. And since the oil and gas industry has provided most of my income over the last 25 years, don’t get me wrong with my next comments. There is a huge undefined cost of not making waste heat energy happen. Every megawatt saved by energy recovery, it is one less megawatt of petroleum energy that needs to be researched, drilled, developed, pipelined, transported, (occasionally spilled, recovered, cleaned), refined, converted, transported, (occasionally spilled, recovered, cleaned - again), protected, and basically globally ‘influenced’. If anyone could really add those combined costs of remote world oil and gas research and production and our associated increase in military requirements, the number would have to be truly staggering. And guess who gets that bill?

    When does Waste Heat start to happen?
    It is happening now. Do an online search on ‘waste heat systems’, ‘organic Rankine cycle’, ‘thermo acoustic’, ‘adsorption chiller’ and see all the current activity. I think it will be main stream sooner than you or I think. Wake-up calls are being placed to this true ‘sleeping energy giant’ by many small Waste Heat technology developers. Relatively low tech heat energy recovery technologies like steam and hot water are being combined with remote monitoring to allow unmanned operation distributed waste heat powered systems. If you listen carefully, you can already hear the hum of new products like direct drive high speed steam turbine gensets, ORC expanders, and Stirling heat engines finishing their Beta testing . Or you may pick up the heartbeat of the first six silica gel (same stuff as in the new VCR box that says ‘do not eat’) adsorption chillers in North America. Or you may even get a whiff of a pentane or a steam-ammonia cascading refrigeration cycle.

    You will know when you missed out . . .
    You will know when the waste heat ‘energy giant’ is on his feet when the obvious conglomerate energy equipment & system companies, and some not so obvious energy companies, start to grow Waste Heat’s marketing presence through acquisition. Regardless of how it happens, as these new systems gain more experience, waste heat energy will quietly grow, project by project, becoming the paradigm shift for local or distributed energy production and consumption. But why wait for your profits?
    Until that shift takes place, the early developers will have a chance for ground floor entry into a growing energy play. And early adopters will enjoy an area of competitive advantage through hidden profit recovery. Most of the components of the new waste heat recovery technologies are already commercially available. Feasibility and front end engineering studies of most waste heat systems are affordable and take only a few weeks. Such studies allow more informed ‘go/no-go’ budget decisions even for the smallest commercial heat generator. Next Article?
    Last week I was in a northeastern state standing on a ladder in 20ºF winds on top of a roof pointing my remote temperature sensor into three incinerator exhaust stacks. Depending on that project’s successful study outcome, and more likely of course my client’s permissions, for my next article look for a real-world case study for waste-heat-to-energy options for this modest $10,000 per month natural gas fuel consumption industrial heat recovery client.

    For information on purchasing reprints of this article, contact Tim Tobeck ttobeck@energycentral.com.
    Copyright 2010 CyberTech, Inc.
     
    Contact The Author
    Email the author
    Phone: 713-668-0088
    E-mail Article Printer Friendly
     
  • Click Here For More Articles on Fossil & Biomass


  • Click Here For More Articles By Gary Beck
  • Do you agree or disagree with this article? Send in your own article.

     

    Readers Comments

    Date Comment
    Edward Reid, Jr.
    5.13.04
    Gary,

    Right on! If only we could get the US federal government and ASHRAE to realize that electricity does not magically emerge from electric meters @ 100% efficiency.

    Unfortunately, federal programs all base energy efficiency on site-based measurements, totally ignoring the losses upstream of the electric meter. The energy bill in Congress even offers incentive payments based on site efficiency.

    See the article "Site Energy Measurement Metrics - Simple, Straightforward...and, Wrong" in the September 15, 2003 issue of Public Utilities Fortnightly for a comparison of the site energy and source energy consumption of a prototypical commercial building served by five different energy delivery and end use systems.

    Darin Watson
    5.18.04
    Gary,

    Your comments are correct, however, location and usability of the waste heat remains in question. I have to agree that no mater how you slice it the potential is huge, and capturing even 5-10% would be a major step forward.

    As in many cases, it comes down to education. I read a press release lately were a major energy company was awarded a contract to supply an educational institution with 5MW electric boilers for generation of steam for heating. The rational stated was to allow fuel switching from oil, gas, or nuclear. On the surface this seem questionable, if not downright absurd, in that the production of the electricity to run the electric boiler is only 45% efficient, at best, when gas or oil direct fired would be 85+% percent efficient!!! Seems like a huge price to pay on a continuing basis simply for fuel switching capabilities. As for nuclear, it really does not enter the equation because it is base loaded and marginal capacity is oil or gas.

    Chuck Marshall
    5.18.04
    Gary, You are right on the money with your story. I have been designing and installing "waste heat" recovery systems for the last 20 years and can testify that they are very successful and cost effective. Relatively simple low tech means such as stack and exhaust htx's, wastewater htx's and 3rd stage heat pumps on industrial refrigeration systems really work well. I have been in several hundred industrial, and food processing facilities during the last 10 years and almost without exception can find at least 30% energy savings, primarily by waste heat recovery and other efficiency improvements that give a quick payback. In my experience most of this is "low-hanging fruit" that has a 3 year or less pay-back. Keep up the good work. I will look forward to your next article.

    Chuck Marshall, P.E. 5/18/2004

    Tom Tanton
    5.18.04
    Gary, I don't beleive it fair to claim this is 'free' since in all cases some additional capital in recoveryequipment is required. Second, your savings magintude is based on the 40% efficiency of thermal generators, but applied to allglobal thermal use--much of which is provided at boiler efficiencies of ~85-90%, and much of the thermal energy used is already recaptured. I prefer not to use the term 'waste' since that conveys something the is correctly disposed of...which is not what you really want to convey.

    Tom Bailey
    5.18.04
    When I first told a very large lignite burning electrical generating station that waste heat from their stack could release 100-110 Btu's/ lb / % of inherent moisture removed all I gotwas raised eyebrows. One engineer was nice and said that he had never heard numbers like that. Logic told him it was so but he wasn't convinced. He later asked me just where I went to college and if I had ever written any papers that he could study. Did I have a resume? One power plant burns 42,000 tons of lignite per day and could get the same result from less than 35, 000 if they removed just a few % of the inherent moisture. I got nowhere. The numbers are so mind boggling that they appear to be so impossible and fanciful that engineers have ignored the bearers of the good news as fable. Keep talking because someone will soon be listening.

    Edward Reid, Jr.
    5.18.04
    Tom,

    I'm with you on the terminology. I much prefer "recoverable thermal energy".

    The thermal energy which can be recovered from Rankine-cycle powerplants is greater than the net electric energy they produce. In fact, the largest single component of US energy consumption (EIA) is the energy rejected by electric powerplants.

    Len Gould
    6.2.04
    Water/Steam .48 bar 80degC liquid = 334.9 kj/kg 1 bar 99degC liquid = 414.8 kj/kg 1 bar 100degC vapour = 2676.2 kj/kg (increase of 2261 kj/kg over liquid) 100 bar 600degC vapour - 3622.7 kj/kg (increase of 3208 kj/kg over liquid)

    almost 70% of heat input goes to heat of vapourization which must be entirely discarded at the condensers as very low value heat (< 100 degC), then re-supplied at the boilers. Only way to improve it (marginally) is to raise steam temperatures/pressures to levels where materials characteristics become problems. Still imposes a solid wall barrier around 40% effic.

    The non-condensing turbine circuit. How long until we can no longer afford to throw away that 65 - 70% "heat of vapourization" of the working fluid? Where's the researchers financed by govt. / industry on alternatives? Can we not get some of that subsidy spent "researching" how to glue together coal dust into brikettes re-directed into alternative circuits / conversion systems, e.g. Stealium, Organic coolants, or the grail which would be a "thermovoltaic cell"?

    {voice from the darkness}

    Add your comments:
    Please log in to leave a comment!

    Top

        Home | Register | Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | About Us | Feedback
       Copyright © 2002-2010, CyberTech, Inc. - All rights reserved. Read our Terms of Service.