Energy Central EnergyPulse Home
Home Subscribe Login Contribute to Energy Pulse Advertise on Energy Pulse About Energy Pulse Feedback to Energy Pulse
Search Articles:   
  You are here: Home > Business & Corporate > Article Display


Free Newsletter
Sign up today for your free subscription to the EnergyPulse Weekly Update - delivered directly to your e-mail box.
e-mail:


 

Communicating Smart Meter Value

Sep 9 2010 - 2010-01-01 12:00:00 - Your City

If you are involved in Management or Customer Service and are responsible for communicating the value of smart meters to your utility customers, you don’t want to miss this online discussion - Communicating Smart Meter Value.  more...

Social Media: The new frontier in recruiting, communications and marketing

Sep 13 2010 - 2010-01-01 12:00:00 - Your City

Join social media mavens Matthew Burks and Amanda Shewmake as they provide an insider's perspective on how HR, communications and marketing professionals in energy companies can harness the power of social media to be more effective and productive. more...

Eliminating Obstacles and Delivering the Benefits of the Smart Grid - IBM's Optimized Energy Value Chain (OEVC)

Sep 14 2010 - 2010-01-01 12:00:00 - Your City

The convergence of power and information technologies in the smart grid has created opportunities for finer grained and broader controls of energy flows. These opportunities can improve electric service in multiple dimensions: lower cost, greater reliability, greater customer satisfaction, and more...

Achieving Operational Excellence - What to Consider Before Implementing or Upgrading Your Distribution Management Solutions

Sep 16 2010 - 2010-01-01 12:00:00 - Your City

Significant cost over runs. Changing business requirements. A well thought out plan is essential. Attend this free webcast discussion to hear inside hear three experts in utility operations discuss what utilities need to evaluate when they are considering upgrading or more...

Outsmarting the Smart Grid: IT, Security and Communication Infrastructure  Challenges & Opportunities for Utilities

Sep 21 2010 - 2010-01-01 12:00:00 - Your City

The smart grid is shifting the playing field for utilities. And when the game changes, it pays to be prepared. A nimble solutions partner can help you design the solutions that keep operations on track, even as new challenges come more...

1st CSP Today Concentrated Solar Thermal Power Summit India

Sep 7 2010 - Sep 8 2010 - New Delhi India

Deliver a profitable, productive and commercially successful large scale CSP business in India. Building on the success of past events in USA, Europe & MENA, CSP Today brings to New Delhi the most relevant international experience for the concentrated solar more...

Offshore Wind Energy in North America's Great Lakes Conference

Sep 9 2010 - Sep 10 2010 - Toronto

Two day conference that tackles the most important challenges. A blend of European knowledge from the companies who have been installing offshore wind turbines for the last decade alongside local state governing bodies and leading project developers. Permitting, securing long more...

Autovation 2010

Sep 12 2010 - Sep 15 2010 - Austin, TX - USA

Autovation 2010 is a not-to-miss educational forum that will attract utility executives from around the world looking for new ways to optimize their operations through automation technologies. more...

Global Sustainable Bioenergy North American Convention

Sep 14 2010 - Sep 16 2010 - Minneapolis, MN - USA

The North American convention provides a remarkable opportunity to play a part in guiding renewable energy policy for the 21st century. Attendees will create a resolution that, along with similar resolutions already drafted on four other continents, will help set more...

GridWise Global Forum

Sep 21 2010 - Sep 23 2010 - Washington, DC - USA

Hosted by the GridWise(R) Alliance and the U.S. Department of Energy, the GridWise Global Forum will convene thought leaders from the highest levels of government, business, NGOS, and academia from around the world to discuss the ultimate enabling potential of more...

1. Intro to Nat Gas Trading & Hedging 2. Option Applications in Energy

Sep 20 2010 - Sep 23 2010 - Houston, TX - USA

Introduction to Natural Gas Trading & Hedging - This program provides a comprehensive understanding of the structures that underlie Natural Gas trading. Beyond Essentials: Option Applications in Energy - This course provides a solid practical and conceptual (non-quantitative) understanding of more...

Electric Business Understanding Seminar

Sep 20 2010 - Sep 21 2010 - Houston, TX - USA

Electric Business Understanding provides a comprehensive overview of the electric industry. Position yourself for career advancement by gaining a solid understanding of how the electric business works including key physical, market, and regulatory aspects and how market participants navigate this more...

Electric Market Dynamics Seminar

Sep 22 2010 - Sep 23 2010 - Houston, TX - USA

Electric Market Dynamics offers participants an in-depth understanding of North American electric markets and how they function. Enhance your career by furthering your knowledge of market structures, pricing mechanisms, services offered in markets, and how various participants use the markets more...

Gas and Electric Business Understanding Seminar

Oct 5 2010 - Oct 6 2010 - Los Angeles, CA - USA

Gas and Electric Business Understanding provides a comprehensive overview of the natural gas and electric industries. Position yourself for career success by gaining a solid understanding of how each business works, including key physical, market and regulatory aspects, as well more...

Energy Central
Power Network




Business & Corporate


We know you have something to say!
There is an immediate need for articles on the hot topics in the Power Industry! EnergyPulse, like no other publication, also provides a means for our readers to immediately interact with experts like you.
 
Contribute Today!
Please view our Author Guidelines and send submissions to the editor.

Click For More Articles on Business & Corporate
 
The Need for a Balanced National Energy Policy
10.29.03   Albert Thumann, Executive Director, Association of Energy Engineers

Article Viewed 4338 Times
5 Comments
E-mail Article Printer Friendly
 
  • Email This Author
  • Comment On Article
  • About The Author
  • More Articles By This Author

    The need for a National Energy Plan has become apparent due in part to the following:

    Energy Security

    • The power blackout of 2003 impacting New York, Detroit and other major cities indicates that the present transmission grid is congested, outdated and in dire need of overhaul. According to the Energy Information Administration, electricity use will increase 22% by 2010 placing further demands on an obsolete transmission grid.
    • Since 1985 imports of refined petroleum products have increased by 34%. Today the total import of oil is 55%. The volatility in the Mideast can lead to disruptions in oil supply and higher prices. Since 1970 US production of crude oil has declined from 9.6 million barrels per day to 5.8 million barrels per day. During this same period consumption has increased from 14.7 million barrels per day to 20 million barrels per day. The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) has in the past tightened supplies and has caused gasoline and oil prices to spiral. The “War on Terrorism” will cause further instability to the Mideast region and prioritize this nation’s need to be energy secure.

    The current domestic energy situation and our increasing dependence on foreign oil makes the United States more vulnerable, economically and from a national security perspective, than at any time in our history. A National Energy Plan is required that recognizes the urgent need for Energy Efficiency, Load Management and Supply Strategies.

    The objective of the National Energy Plan is to foster a reliable power generation and transmission system, reduce dependence on foreign oil, and minimize future oil price shocks.

    Following are the recommendations of the National Energy Policy Council of the Association of Energy Engineers:
    Energy Efficiency Technologies and Load Management Programs

    Energy Efficiency
    Energy efficiency technologies can give the nation time to rebuild and modernize the electric transmission infrastructure.

    Energy efficiency improvements have had a major impact on companies’ profitability, decreasing energy usage and reducing greenhouse gasses. Over the last 25 years the per capita use of energy has declined .8 percent. A continuing drive for energy efficiency can help keep prices down and buy the nation time to address critical supply problems.

    Energy efficiency programs have saved consumers over 25 billion dollars a year while improving the quality of life. Energy efficiency has saved 70 quadrillion BTUs from 1972 to 1999. Specific programs which need to be included in a National Energy Plan are:

    Reduce Energy Consumption in Buildings & Residences through Efficiency Improvement
    A comprehensive energy strategy could double the energy efficiency of buildings by 2010, slash carbon emissions in half and save $100 billion a year in energy bills. Strategies to reduce energy consumption for this sector should include the following recommendations:

    • Research and development investment for energy efficient buildings must be increased.
    • The Institutional Conservation Program for Schools and Hospitals, originally started in 1978, should be reinstated and expanded to state and local government buildings.
    • Regulatory agencies should require energy suppliers to promote energy efficiency improvements to their customers.
    • Investment tax credits and accelerated depreciation should be implemented to stimulate adoption for efficiency investments.
    • The Federal Government is the largest energy consumer with 500,000 buildings. By funding energy efficient technologies, consumption can be reduced by 20%, saving a billion taxpayer dollars on energy costs annually.
    • Appliance standards need to be upgraded. New efficiency standards for clothes dryers, water heaters and air conditioners could reduce electricity demand by the equivalent of 170 300-megawatt plants over 20 years.
    • A tax credit should be given toward the purchase of high efficiency appliances.
    • Fund weatherization programs for low income housing and provide tax credits to improve the efficiency of existing and new homes.

    Reduce Energy Consumption from Industrial Processes through Efficiency Improvement

    • Industrial processes account for approximately 37% of total energy used.
    • Large industry has demonstrated that on a voluntary basis it can make significant improvement in process efficiency. Small and medium manufacturing plants, however, lag behind. Energy awareness through education and low-cost audits can stimulate this sector of industry.
    • Research and development investment should be increased to improve process efficiency, which will make a significant impact on reducing industrial energy consumption.
    • Investment tax credits and accelerated depreciation should be implemented to stimulate adoption for efficiency investments.
    • Increase education in the area of load management, assisting industry in better understanding the value of time when making electric and gas energy purchases.

    Reduce Oil Consumption for the Transportation Sector

    • Fifty percent of the world’s oil is consumed by vehicles. In the US there are more than 200 million gasoline and diesel powered cars, buses and trucks, which account for 27% of the energy consumption. Fuel economy standards reached their peak in 1988 when the average passenger vehicle covered 26 miles on a gallon of gasoline. The average fell to 24 miles per gallon in the year 2000 because more people were driving light trucks, which have lower mandated efficiency standards than cars.
    • It is recommended that manufacturers be required to raise the average fuel use by cars and light trucks to 35 miles per gallon by 2010, which would result in oil savings of 1.5 million barrels a day.
    • A tax credit should be given to consumers who purchase alternate fuel vehicles.

    Load Management

    • Load management and demand response programs encourage electric customers to reduce peak demand through real time pricing, incentives, and utility-customer partnerships.
    • Customers of electricity can control load through fuel switching, energy storage, curtailment, self-generation and continuous load shedding. Utilities, Independent System Operators (ISO) and Regional Transmission Operators (RTO) need to encourage load management to reduce transmission congestion and the need for new generation capacity.
    • The National Energy Plan should require utilities, Independent System Operators (ISO) and Regional Transmission Operators (RTO) to create and implement load management and demand response programs and provide incentives to customers to shed load.

    Transmission and Supply Strategies

    Upgrading Transmission & Distribution Systems

    The United States electric generation and transmission system is 70 years old and is based on technologies from the 1950’s. The electric transmission grid consists of approximately 160,000 miles of high voltage transmission lines and is in dire need of replacement and expansion .The power blackout of 2003 and the conclusions reached by the National American Electric Reliability Council (NERC) indicate that the nation is fast approaching a crisis stage with respect to the reliability of the transmission grids.

    The transmission grid has become a “super highway” for electric utilities to buy and sell power. Congestion from the increased flow of electricity over great distances is now a reality. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has identified causes of congestion including:

    • Insufficient transmission lines to match electricity generated.
    • Inadequate transmission capacity to meet demand.

    According to Edison Electric Institute:
    “Between 1979 and 1989, transmission capacity grew at a slightly faster rate than the demand for electricity during peak periods. But in the subsequent years, infrastructure needs did not keep up with that demand. To handle the requirements that the transmission system expects over the next 10 years, about 27,000 gigawatt-miles are required, however, only 6,000 gigawatt-miles are planned.”

    A national energy strategy must include:

    • Policies that encourage construction and modernization of the transmission grid. There is a need to “streamline” the permitting and siting process.
    • Policies that encourage investment in the modernization of the transmission grid. FERC has indicated that $12.6 billion in new transmission investment is needed to overcome 16 major transmission congestions.
    • Plans to protect transmission grids from potential computer hackers.

    Encouraging Electric Generating Capacity
    The National Energy Plan should encourage expanding of energy supplies while recognizing that no single energy source can meet growing energy needs.

    A national energy strategy must address the growing power generating and transmission crisis in the United States. Elements of this strategy should include the following measures:

    • Encouraging the development of distributed energy resources, including cogeneration through tax credits and accelerated depreciation. Distributed generation near loads reduces transmission congestion.
    • Removing the barriers to distributed energy resources, particularly those related to cogeneration.
    • Concentrating on clean-coal technologies for repowering and new plants which meet environmental regulations.
    • Compressing the time required by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to license a nuclear plant and support the movement to standardize nuclear plant designs.
    • Increasing research and development of new power generating technologies.

    Develop Alternative Energy Industry

    Alternative energy sources offer environmentally acceptable ways to generate and distribute electricity. The National Energy Plan should include:

    • Increased research and development investment funding for alternative energy.
    • Increased tax credits to encourage investments in alternative energy.
    • Federal & State incentives for deployment of alternative energy.

    Oil Supplies A National Energy Plan must include insuring adequate supplies without substantially raising prices. The Energy Information Administration forecasts a sharp increase in petroleum imports from the current rate of 55% to 64% by 2020. It is recommended that:

    • Policies that encourage investment in crude oil exploration and production be included in the National Energy Plan.
    • Policies to encourage eight or more new refineries during the next 20 years.
    • Policies to encourage Energy Technology of research and development for exploration and production, as well as expanding production in existing reserves.

    Natural Gas Supplies

    • Policies that encourage investment in natural gas exploration and production be included in the National Energy Plan.
    • Policies to encourage the expansion and improvement of the gas transmission system.
    • Policies to encourage energy technology research and development for exploration and production, as well as expanding production in existing reserves.

    Coal

    Currently coal accounts for 23 % of the US energy consumption with a 250 year supply of recoverable reserves. The National Energy Plan as related to coal needs to focus on:

    • Clean Coal Technologies: The use of advanced coal technologies meets environmental regulations and is more efficient.
    • Funding research and development to reduce carbon, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides emissions from coal.
    • Financial incentives to encourage using clean coal technologies to upgrade existing coal fired units.
    • Review policies that restrict investment in coal mining capacity.

    The National Energy Plan must include encouraging both demand-side and supply-side options. Energy security can best be accomplished by development of all forms of supplies. An effective energy strategy must balance energy needs and be sensitive to environmental issues.

    For information on purchasing reprints of this article, contact Tim Tobeck ttobeck@energycentral.com.
    Copyright 2010 CyberTech, Inc.
     
    Contact The Author
    Email the author
    Phone: 770-447-5083, ext. 211
    E-mail Article Printer Friendly
     
  • Click Here For More Articles on Business & Corporate


  • Click Here For More Articles By Albert Thumann
  • Do you agree or disagree with this article? Send in your own article.

     

    Readers Comments

    Date Comment
    Ravinder Singh
    11.1.03
    Dear Albert, You have picked up my ideas. For over 10 years I have advanced such ideas WHICH ARE ALSO BACKED BY MAJOR INNOVATIONS. I unsuccessfully tried to advice most large American Utilities who now experience bankrupcies and are financial mess.-- regards-ravindersinghy77@yahoo.com

    Lloyd Weaver
    11.4.03
    I agree with all these comments and would go even further with oil conservation. I feel the auto industry is in the beginning throws of a major technological change to accomplish everything asked for here. The big push by the Japanese to lead in hybrid drives proves this, and they are way ahead of us.

    Also, I’ve spoken several times on these pages about a new high speed monorail system to replace a lot of air traffic plus giving us the ultimate mass people-mover and high-speed container freight-forwarding system. I’ve recommended the 100 year old invention of the gyro-monorail system, and still firmly believe this is the right technology pick over maglev. Maglev –our DOT bureaucrat pick- is not remotely practical. We need to be a lot better at picking the big winners in technologies to solve our energy problems, and then we must have the resolve and leadership to do them.

    Also, some experts say current oil imports are much higher than indicated in this article. I hope Mr. Thumann is low on oil importing statistics, because we have only 23 or so billion barrels in proven oil reserves according to EIA data. So at 20 million baralles a day, we have only about a 3 year oil supply if we used only our own and only an 8.5 year supply if the oil import levels are as low as Mr. Thumann states. In real terms, I believe oil imports are much higher, which is advantageous right now.

    This article is an excellent summary of what we need to do. But now we need to get down to specificity on what is really going to save the oil etc., like hybrid drives and a new train system. In their new bill, the Congress is doing most of the things Mr. Thumann asks for, except mandating higher auto efficiency standards and sponsoring a new train system along our super highways. But Detroit doesn’t have to worry, if they don’t do it, the Japanese will. The Japanese have plenty of car plants here and are building more every year. They can and will gear up to meet our needs with hybrid vehicles, which they apparently plan on doing.

    Thus, we must work much harder at it, which I think Mr. Thumann is implying. We are too complacent, hybrid vehicles being a major example. We must get better at picking winner technologies to solve our energy problems; general policies by themselves won’t do it. The original telegraph invention is a good example. Congress sponsored a specific telegraph invention (Morse’s) to try, not a free-for-all in technology development. Free for all shot gun approaches is what government does now for energy, and it isn’t working.

    In summary, the marketplace can do a lot to solve our energy problems, but not all. Government investments must pick winners too, and they just aren’t doing it and don’t appear to care much, which is a shame. Our entrepreneurial bureaucrat legacy that George Washington gave us and that has served us so well up until now is asleep at the wheel. I’m sorry to say that it will be a lot harder to solve our energy problems as long as this is the case in our government.

    Lloyd Weaver, lloyd@suscom-maine.net

    Nan Nalder
    11.4.03
    I serve as President, Northwest Hydroelectric Association, and am concerned that the author did not include the significant role hydropower playes in the Nation's energy mix. Here in the Pacific Northwest, hydro is the pre-eminent source of clean electricity. I attach to this comment information from the National Hydropower Association (webpage) www,hydro.org. NWHA is a member of NHA and we support their actions in the National hydro arena.

    Nan A. Nalder, M.P.A.

    Facts You Should Know About Hydropower

    Hydropower is a clean, renewable and reliable energy source that serves national environmental and energy policy objectives. Hydropower converts kinetic energy from falling water into electricity without consuming more water than is produced by nature.

    Since July 24, 1880, when 16 brush-arc lamps were powered using a water turbine at the Wolverine Chair Factory in Grand Rapids, MI, hydropower has played a vital role in the U.S. energy mix. Here are some facts about hydropower:

    A MAJOR SOURCE OF ENERGY

    The United States is one of the largest producers of hydropower in the world, second only to Canada. Hydropower contributes between 8 and 12 percent of U.S. electrical generation, or enough electricity to supply the nearly 35 million residential customers in California, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Texas. In the Pacific Northwest, up to 70 percent of electricity is generated from hydropower. Of the 75,187 existing significant dams in the U.S., less than 3 percent are used for hydroelectric generation. Total U.S. hydroelectric capacity is 103.8 GW including pumped storage projects. Non-federal, licensed conventional hydroelectric capacity (excluding pumped storage) equals 40.0 Gigawatts (GW) at 2,162 sites in the U.S. The federal government owns another 38.2 GW at 165 sites (excluding pumped storage). Throughout the world, about one-fifth of electricity is generated from hydropower.

    GREAT POTENTIAL ... BUT UNCERTAIN FUTURE

    There are 4,316 MW of "incremental" hydropower available at sites with existing hydroelectric facilities. "Incremental" hydropower is defined as capacity additions or improved efficiency at existing hydro projects. According to river basin analyses, there are nearly 70,000 Megawatts (MW) of potential hydropower generation in the U.S. when only engineering and economic factors are considered. When screening for environmental, legal and institutional factors at potential sites, there are 29,780 MW of hydro generation-most of which can be developed without the construction of a single, new dam. There are 16,998 MW available at dams without hydroelectric capacity. Through 2017, more than half of all non-federal hydroelectric capacity-more than 32,000 MW of power-must go through the federal licensing process. It will cost more tahn $2.7 billion (in 2001 constant dollars) to process license applications for 307 projects in 39 states. Typically it takes 8 to 10 years per project to get a new license. Of 246 hydroelectric projects that went through relicensing between 1986 and 2001, the average annual generation loss was 4.23%. In its energy projections through 2020, the Energy Information Administration has forecasted decreased hydroelectric capacity as "regulatory actions limit capacity at existing projects."

    CLEAN AND RENEWABLE ... A SOUND ENVIRONMENTAL CHOICE

    Nationally, more people (93 percent) believe hydropower is important or very important for meeting future electricity needs than any other electricity source. Like wind, solar, geothermal and biomass, hydropower is a renewable source of electricity. Water, its "fuel", is essentially infinite, replenished by the hydrologic cycle, which is powered by the sun. Hydropower accounts for 80 percent of the nation's total renewable electricity generation making it the nation's leading renewable energy source. In 1999, hydropower avoided the release of an additional 77 million metric tons of carbon equivalent into the atmosphere. Without hydropower, the U.S. would have to burn an additional 121 million tons of coal, plus 27 million barrels of oil, and 741 billion cubic feet of natural gas combined. By generating carbon-free electricity, hydropower avoids burning fossil fuels and releasing an amount of carbon dioxide that equals the annual exhaust of 62.2 million passenger cars, or half of the cars on U.S. roads. Hydroelectric projects can enhance wetlands and support healthy fisheries. Wildlife preserves can be created around reservoirs, which in some cases, provide stable habitats for endangered or threatened species.

    RELIABLE, EFFICIENT, SECURE ... AND FUN!

    Today's hydropower turbines are capable of converting 90 percent of available energy into electricity - that is more efficient than any other form of generation. Even the best fossil fuel power plant is only about 50 percent efficient. Hydropower's operational flexibility - its unique ability to change output quickly - is highly

    Len Gould
    11.4.03
    I agree with the thrust of the article as far as stating problems, but find the proposed solutions weak. How are you going to "modernize the transmission grid" when licenses can be held up for years while lawyers debate the level of endangerment of a particular cactus in a southwestern desert? What is needed is a specific government action to a) clearly state an honest list of species which require protection, then refuse to accept additions without a process equally tedious (and expensive) as the current licensing. b) clearly state a scientifically defensible and honest set of facts on nuclear reactor risks to the public and prosecute groups such as Greenpeace etc. who routinely slander the industry's record with wildly exagerated statements. c) clearly educate the public on the costs to them individually of such activities. How much has/will it cost the US electricity consumer to allow e.g. France, Japan and South Africa to become the world leaders in nuclear power generation?

    What is needed more than any specific "choosing of winners" is some politicians with the nations interest at the fore rather than their own next election.

    Lloyd Weaver
    11.5.03
    The proposed solutions are not weak. This is a great general summary of what we must do.

    I agree political leaders (as opposed to followers) need to look beyond elections. But lacking specifics to invest in and not insisting on these specifics revealed and their cost is why Congress is failing us on energy.

    Consider, the Japanese are eating us for lunch in hybrid vehicles, high-tech batteries, steam turbines, soon with gas turbines (with china helping), solar power, and heat recovery apparatus etc. Need I say more?

    Congress is lost in a sea of generality which is solving nothing. Specifics are needed or else we lose. Congress needs to hold the line on it’s big labs and start pouring money into private projects like hybrid drives to help our auto industry, coal gasification and related power systems (there, congress must scrutinize as DOE is all fouled up on this one), new nuclear, solar cells, high-speed gyro monorail (steel wheels) train etc.

    That’s how we solve our energy problem, by putting public $ behind what works or that looks like it might work and that has a big effect i.e. that multiplies fast and accumulates fast with increasing production.

    Lloyd Weaver, lloyd@suscom-maine.net

    Add your comments:
    Please log in to leave a comment!

    Top

        Home | Register | Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | About Us | Feedback
       Copyright © 2002-2010, CyberTech, Inc. - All rights reserved. Read our Terms of Service.