Energy Central EnergyPulse Home
Home Subscribe Login Contribute to Energy Pulse Advertise on Energy Pulse About Energy Pulse Feedback to Energy Pulse
Search Articles:   
  You are here: Home > Environmental, Emissions & Carbon Management > Article Display


Free Newsletter
Sign up today for your free subscription to the EnergyPulse Weekly Update - delivered directly to your e-mail box.
e-mail:


 

Biofuels: The Promise of the Next Generations

Feb 10 2010 - 1:00 PM Eastern - Your location

The second wave of biofuels such as cellulosic ethanol, algae and others bypass the food vs. fuel controversy and are on the cusp of commercialization. This webinar will review the latest developments in the advanced biofuel space with leading companies more...

Conducting a distributed chorus

Feb 17 2010 - 12:00 Eastern - Your City

Join Intelligent Utility managing editor Kate Rowland, along with a panel from PHI including Rob Stewart, manager of technology evaluation and implementation, and Todd McGregor, AMI director, for an interactive discussion about this company's work to build a more intelligent more...

21st Century T&D: Building the Transmission Piece of Smart Grid

Feb 18 2010 - 12:00 Eastern - Your City

Join industry leaders and Marty Rosenberg, Editor-in-Chief of EnergyBiz magazine, for an interactive discussion about the critical relationship between transmission and distribution (T&D) investment and smart grid success. As the energy enterprise gets smarter toward the consumer end with smart more...

Transforming the Electrical Grid: Addressing Transformation Strategies to Implementing A Smart Grid

Feb 25 2010 - 3:00-4:00pm Eastern - Your City

This webcast should be attended by those individuals that are responsible for identifying, planning and evaluating Smart Grid solutions, including those that empower and engage consumers and are easily assimilated with existing or new technology and business processes. more...

Smart Grid Revolution

Feb 18 2010 - Feb 19 2010 - AUSTIN, TX - USA

ACI's Smart Grid Revolution February 18-19, 2010 A two day strategic event bringing together utility professionals, government & state officials & consultants involved in deployment of the smart grid. To learn strategies which will improve energy efficiency programs & operations, more...

EnergyBiz Leadership Forum 2010: Energy's Emerging Architecture

Feb 28 2010 - Mar 2 2010 - Washington, DC

In 2009, a global economic meltdown collided with an energy crisis to turn the world on its ear. In the United States we've witnessed an unprecedented spending on energy resource development and infrastructure. As a result, a new energy architecture more...

CERAWeek 2010

Mar 8 2010 - Mar 12 2010 - Houston, TX - USA

CERAWeek, IHS CERA's 29th Executive Conference, is recognized as a leading forum offering insight into the energy future. Each year senior policymakers, energy and power executives, and financial and technology leaders from over 55 countries engage with CERA experts in more...

2nd Annual Thin Film Solar Summit Europe

Mar 17 2010 - Mar 18 2010 - Berlin Germany

The conference will provide a comprehensive analysis of the thin film industry and its key challenges in an interactive manner. Leading companies will share their experiences through panel debates and high-level presentations. A great opportunity to network with the whole more...

Gas and Electric Business Understanding Seminar

Feb 24 2010 - Feb 25 2010 - New York, NY - USA

Gas and Electric Business Understanding provides a comprehensive overview of the natural gas and electric industries. Position yourself for career success by gaining a solid understanding of how each business works, including key physical, market and regulatory aspects, as well more...

Gas Business Understanding Seminar

Mar 1 2010 - Mar 2 2010 - Houston, TX - USA

Gas Business Understanding provides a comprehensive overview of the natural gas industry. Position yourself for career advancement by gaining a solid understanding of how the gas business works including key physical, market, and regulatory aspects and how market participants navigate more...

Electric Business Understanding Seminar

Mar 3 2010 - Mar 4 2010 - Houston, TX - USA

Electric Business Understanding provides a comprehensive overview of the electric industry. Position yourself for career advancement by gaining a solid understanding of how the electric business works including key physical, market, and regulatory aspects and how market participants navigate this more...

Gas Market Dynamics Seminar

Mar 3 2010 - Mar 4 2010 - Houston, TX - USA

Gas Market Dynamics offers participants an in-depth understanding of North American natural gas markets and how they function. Enhance your career by furthering your knowledge of market structure, supply and demand, services offered in gas markets, and how various participants more...

Energy Central
Power Network




Environmental, Emissions & Carbon Management


We know you have something to say!
There is an immediate need for articles on the hot topics in the Power Industry! EnergyPulse, like no other publication, also provides a means for our readers to immediately interact with experts like you.
 
Contribute Today!
Please view our Author Guidelines and send submissions to the editor.

Click For More Articles on Environmental, Emissions & Carbon Management
 
Maine's new CFL recycling program: Should manufacturers pay?
11.3.09   Alexandra Behringer, Research Manager, E SOURCE

Article Viewed 1838 Times
2 Comments
E-mail Article Printer Friendly
 
  • Email This Author
  • Comment On Article
  • About The Author
  • More Articles By This Author

    Maine is the first state in the United States to require manufacturers of compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs) to pay for collection and recycling of the bulbs. "An Act to Provide for the Safe Collection and Recycling of Mercury-Containing Light Bulbs" (LD 973) passed the Maine Legislature in May 2009 and went into effect September 2009. The legislation also limits the mercury content of all lighting products. Similar bills are being considered in California, Massachusetts, and Vermont.

    What does this legislation mean for existing CFL recycling programs? Although requiring manufacturers to finance CFL recycling may seem like a sensible approach, manufacturers face obstacles in implementing such a program. And if similar legislation is adopted in other states, it could have important implications for utility-sponsored CFL recycling programs.

    Since June 2007, Efficiency Maine (part of the Maine Public Utilities Commission) has been running a free statewide pilot CFL recycling program for residential bulbs at about 200 retail stores. According to Richard Bacon, program manager for Efficiency Maine, the cost is "approximately $3,000.00 per year for collection buckets, and about the same amount for the time it takes field representatives to deliver buckets and train store clerks. There are also additional costs in adding recycling information to our advertisements that promote CFLs. Hard costs are around $6,000.00, and ancillary marketing costs might be $10,000 to $15,000."

    Although the law took effect in September, planning is still in the preliminary stages. Manufacturers are required to submit a plan to the Maine Department of Environmental Protection by January 1, 2010. Once approved, the program must be operational by January 1, 2011 (unless the law is modified at some point).

    Bacon doesn't expect any change in the current CFL recycling program through the end of 2009. He says that Efficiency Maine will continue running the program through 2010, while transition planning is finalized. However, "it is not Efficiency Maine's intent to run this program forever -- we're not a recycling agency."

    In discussions with Efficiency Maine, the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) inquired about the prospect of substituting industry funding for the Efficiency Maine program with the state retaining operational control, but Efficiency Maine staff showed little interest, according to Mark Kohorst, senior manager for environment and safety with NEMA. "The Maine law includes a provision that allows manufacturers to do this, and we thought it might minimize disruption and help keep costs down. Instead, it seems like we'll have to build much of the system from the ground up."

    Yet Bacon says that "the infrastructure is in place and would only need to be modified somewhat to expand to all lamps, including residential linear lamps; and secondly, if through negotiations with all parties it is agreed to that Efficiency Maine is the best venue to manage the statewide CFL recycling program, then we would strongly consider it." He envisions two additional possibilities for setting up a new CFL recycling program: "The lamp manufacturers could each create their own programs, or they could pool their money and issue a Request for Proposals for third-party providers, perhaps recycling companies, to handle the recycling and marketing of the program," he explains.

    The manufacturer perspective

    Mark Kohorst believes it isn't that simple. NEMA's "primary concern in Maine is that a manufacturer-funded and -administered program is the highest-cost and least-efficient way to establish a convenient recycling program for household lamps."

    The state of Maine regards this new legislation as building upon its existing computer recycling (e-waste) law, which requires electronics manufacturers to pay for recycling. Yet Kohorst notes that "paying $15 to recycle a $700 TV is one thing. But the cost of recycling a lamp, not just processing, but transport, administration, and other costs, equals a huge percentage of a bulb's sales price. And there's no model for recycling any other product that has all these factors involved."

    One of the big unknowns is how much it will cost to transport bulbs from the collection sites to recycling facilities. "The processing costs may be somewhat uniform, but the actual cost per bulb is going to be a lot more in rural areas where the bulbs need to be transported a long way at considerable expense, and that varies a lot in different states." he says. "And these products have long lifetimes. How do you plan for and cost out the business model for recycling a product you're selling today but won't take back for seven years?"

    Kohorst also points out that there is no intrinsic value in lamp recycling for bulb manufacturers, like there would be for, say, aluminum manufacturers who can re-use aluminum from recycled soda cans to create new cans. "We can recover some of the mercury, which is recycled and used to make more lamps. But there is nothing to recoup the cost that makes the bulbs worth recycling from an economic standpoint. If there were, industry would have much greater incentive to do this."

    Implementation challenges

    According to Mark Kohorst, logistical challenges abound for a new collectively managed, manufacturer-funded CFL recycling program. "We would have to take over or renegotiate contracts in place, establish relationships with many retailers, and figure out how much each manufacturer pays," he explains. And manufacturers will have to somehow ensure that they collect only their own bulbs. "GE doesn't want to be paying to collect Phillips bulbs," Kohorst adds. "We may therefore have to segregate lamps by manufacturer -- which no retailer's going to want to do."

    Surprisingly, NEMA is having difficulty just convincing retailers to participate. Primary collection sites for the current Efficiency Maine program include home improvement stores and hardware stores, many of which may be willing to continue participating if there are no additional costs or administrative hassles. However, NEMA recently met with retail-sector associations representing grocery and drug stores, and found that many of these types of retailers do not want to take part in a CFL recycling program.

    "Grocery and drugstore retailers sell a lot of CFLs, and their participation would really help make a recycling program convenient. But they're worried about liability and storage space, and we suspect many will not want to participate," he says. "If our goal is to offer a program with a lot of convenient collection sites, this makes it difficult to achieve."

    Who should pay for CFL Recycling?

    Currently, only two large national retailers, IKEA and Home Depot, fund and manage CFL collection and recycling through their stores. On the other hand, numerous utilities provide financial incentives for CFLs and sponsor CFL recycling programs to provide an end-of-life option for bulbs they promote. This may be in the context of a specific service territory, or partnering with other utilities, retailers, and state agencies to provide comprehensive services throughout a state. Not surprisingly, utilities and manufacturers have differing opinions as to who should ultimately foot the bill for CFL recycling.

    Kim Sherman, product portfolio manager at Xcel Energy, says "CFL recycling is a service in which all stakeholders should be leading, including cities, counties and governments. Due to a state statute in Minnesota, Xcel Energy spends a portion of its energy efficiency budget to promote and recycle spent CFLs." If, she notes, the burden of paying for bulb recycling is someday taken over by manufacturers in Minnesota, the utility could then put more resources into education and promotion. "Currently, we do some marketing, but the bulk of our limited budget is spent on recycling bulbs."

    John Hargove, senior program manager at Nevada Energy says "I believe that the right people to run a CFL program -- or at least be significant contributors to it -- are the manufacturers, because they're making a big portion of the money on the sale of CFLs, and they're also well-positioned to reuse the material. And I think retailers are the primary mechanism for the movement of the material -- theoretically, they can send collected bulbs back upstream to the CFL manufacturer," he says. "But does taking over CFL recycling present a good cost-benefit for manufacturers? Is it okay for the retailer? If there is absolutely no value to the recycled CFL, then the entire cost has to be borne by someone or some collection of people."

    In comparison, NEMA believes in "a shared-responsibility approach where everyone contributes according to their strengths. What manufacturers do best is reduce the amount of mercury in bulbs. Lamps have a fraction of the mercury they used to contain just 10 years ago, and they're very close to introducing non-mercury alternatives that are going to be even better. And retailers have the one-to-one, upfront relationship with the customers -- which makes them more logical collection sites," Kohorst explains.

    "Governments have enforcement authority, which they unfortunately don't use often enough. They should enforce lamp recycling in the business sector, which by far has the biggest percentage of lamps and mercury right now," He adds. "We think utilities are in a good position to provide funding for recycling, to recover the funds, and to spread them across a very broad base. Economically, that makes more sense than forcing manufacturers to absorb a 50 to 75 percent increase in the cost of the product."

    Passing the costs on

    Who will ultimately absorb the additional costs that manufacturers take on to recycle CFLs in the state of Maine? They may end up being passed on to consumers, which could have a negative effect on CFL sales. "If manufacturers can add these costs to CFL bulbs, you're pushing up the price of a product that governments, NGOs, manufacturers, retailers, and utilities are promoting," says Mark Kohorst. "Over the last few years, there's been a lot of progress made in making them more affordable. This type of policy decision could reverse that trend and force manufacturers to make the bulbs more expensive."

    Big-box retailers may not accept a price increase, which would pose an additional challenge for manufacturers in planning and launching a new program. In fact, Kohorst says that bulb prices are not ultimately determined by the manufacturers, but by large national chains like Walmart, Lowe's, and Home Depot, which have enormous buying power. "It is possible that some retailers will reject a 50-cent or so increase in the wholesale price of CFL bulbs, and instead may choose to procure bulbs from lower-cost, less well known manufacturers from Asia," he explains. "It is difficult for U.S. manufacturers to make these demands on their retail partners -- especially with a commodity product like this."

    As a result, Kohorst thinks it makes more sense to spread the cost more broadly through either a solid-waste disposal charge, or through existing utility ratepayer-funded CFL recycling programs for electricity consumers, where available.

    Will manufacturers continue selling CFLs in Maine?

    Starting a new CFL recycling program from the ground up presents manufacturers with a number of logistical challenges, including the reluctance of some retailers to participate, and the potential for much higher costs. Will it even be worth it for manufacturers to continue selling CFLs in the state of Maine?

    "This is a fundamental question that manufacturers will have to answer," says John Hargrove. "If this legislation creates a situation where lighting manufacturers can no longer sell into that market, then the legislation will have had the opposite effect. What will end up happening is only incandescent light bulbs will be sold -- which nobody wants." In addition, this possibility has the potential to severely impact utility efforts to promote efficient light bulbs.

    "Significant change is often painful. If manufacturers are willing to take over the costs and administration of CFL recycling programs, how do we collectively as a society make this effective? You can't pin all the cost on somebody that can't generate a benefit from it -- otherwise, they won't participate, or they'll go broke trying," Hargrove explains.

    A decision by manufacturers as to whether they will continue selling CFLs in Maine can only be made on an individual company level -- antitrust regulations prohibit such discussions among competitors that supply the same market. "Each company will have to independently look at the situation and make a business decision on a case-by-case basis," Kohorst says.

    In the meantime, NEMA is moving forward to identify the best way to meet the requirements of the new law in Maine. "We're looking into all possible collection mechanisms. We will be talking further with recyclers who are already engaged in providing services in the state. Our goal is to find the most manageable, least-cost way to do this that meets state requirements and recovers the highest achievable number of lamps."

    Kohorst would advise other states that consider similar legislation to "avoid market disruptions and overly costly approaches that are going to interfere with the increased use of energy-efficient lighting. Everyone wants people to use energy-efficient light bulbs, and CFLs have distinct advantages over incandescents. There are cost-effective ways to increase recycling behavior."

    Numerous CFL recycling programs have been established over the past few years, but we have a long way to go to change the consumer mind-set that light bulbs are a throwaway item. Ultimately, it will benefit all supporters of CFL recycling -- retailers, manufacturers, state and local governments, utilities, and consumers -- to come up with a solution that is not too burdensome on any one stakeholder in order to avoid losing ground in CFL recycling efforts.

    For information on purchasing reprints of this article, contact Tim Tobeck ttobeck@energycentral.com.
    Copyright 2010 CyberTech, Inc.
     
    Contact The Author
    Email the author
    Phone: 303-345-9153
    E-mail Article Printer Friendly
     
  • Click Here For More Articles on Environmental, Emissions & Carbon Management


  • Click Here For More Articles By Alexandra Behringer
  • Do you agree or disagree with this article? Send in your own article.

     

    Readers Comments

    Date Comment
    Jim Beyer
    11.4.09
    Recycling? How about REPLACING? My CFLs seem to burn out almost as fast as incandescents. I don't know how they can cite 8,000-10,000 hours when they burn out after 1,000-2,000. Any such state mandates should also come with guarantees on the part of the manufacturers.

    But, to your point, Home Depot's acceptance of burnt out CFLs is a big help. Since gov't can't do anything with the bulbs anyway (only the manufacturers can) it's mainly a collection issue at the local level. On this point, I don't have any problem with the private sector stepping up, in exchange for some foot traffic to their stores. (As long as they don't just dump them in the trash afterwards...)

    James Carson
    11.6.09
    JimB: They are burning out so fast because you are flicking the switch too much. Just leave them on and they will last a very long time. Every time you turn it on, you hit the ballast and that is what is failing. You also will kill them quickly if you have them on a dimmer switch.

    http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=cfls.pr_cfls_about

    Add your comments:
    Please log in to leave a comment!

    Top

        Home | Register | Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | About Us | Feedback
       Copyright © 2002-2010, CyberTech, Inc. - All rights reserved. Read our Terms of Service.