Energy Central EnergyPulse Home
Home Subscribe Login Contribute to Energy Pulse Advertise on Energy Pulse About Energy Pulse Feedback to Energy Pulse
Search Articles:   
  You are here: Home > Article Display


Free Newsletter
Sign up today for your free subscription to the EnergyPulse Weekly Update - delivered directly to your e-mail box.
e-mail:


 

Waste Conversion Congress East Coast

Monday Jun 17, 2013 - Tuesday Jun 18, 2013 - Boston, Massachusetts - USA

Deliver a profitable and operational waste conversion project by securing finance, feedstock and approval more...

Data Informed's Marketing Analytics and Customer Engagement

Monday Jun 24, 2013 - Tuesday Jun 25, 2013 - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania - USA

Data Informed´s Marketing Analytics and Customer Engagement provides marketing, sales, and customer support managers with the information they need to create an effective data-driven customer strategy. more...


 OR 


We know you have something to say!
There is an immediate need for articles on the hot topics in the Power Industry! EnergyPulse, like no other publication, also provides a means for our readers to immediately interact with experts like you.
 
Contribute Today!
Please view our Author Guidelines and send submissions to the editor.

 
Hedging in the $8.00 World in One Word - Options
2.26.03   Thomas Lord, President, PDF Commodity Solutions

Article Viewed 477 Times
6 Comments
 
  • Email This Author
  • Comment On Article
  • About The Author
  • More Articles By This Author

    Natural Gas has taken off on another of its not so infrequent excursions into the stratosphere of pricing. Depending on the commentator, prices are either going to revert to $3.50 or go to $10 in the next three hours. What does the energy consumer do now? Hedge – but learn from California. What can consumers do at these prices? They can buy long forwards or they can buy call options. I know – buy options? But then don’t I have to pay premiums? And if prices go down don’t I lose my money? Let’s examine all these points. Paying premium is the first. Yes, options cost up front money and, yes, if prices go down the premium is a non-recovered sunk cost. My response is: so what? Let’s examine the list of the potential results and you will see why I feel that way. If you buy forwards and prices go down, what happens? You have to pay margin. If the prices drop 25%, the margin will equal the price drop. If you are borrowing money to post margin the cost is the cost of money times the margin call. At 8% money, the 25% margin call mean that 2% of your energy bill is lost interest costs – so the potential premium loss is already reduced by the margin costs. Plus don’t forget, the margin call shows as debt on the 10Q. So the 25% margin call would reduce earnings much more than the option premium would – yes? If prices go up you are paying the option call price plus the premium but you are probably still competitive. Second, if you buy a forward and prices drop, what happens to your competitive position? Does paying 25% more for energy hurt your competitive position more than the sunk cost of the premium? I would expect that it would. Third, what happens if the economy slows down due to Iraq and prices drop? This is the California experience showing through. Forwards are a risky exposure when the potential for a price drop exists and demand is also uncertain. If your demand drops and the price drops, you could be faced with selling above market energy back to the market and taking a direct loss on what was supposed to be a “hedge”. A consumer hedge using a forward can only be a hedge if the consumption is guaranteed. Otherwise, you run the risk of having a purchase obligation without a corresponding use. So yes, options are expensive now but they may make more economic sense than a buying firm energy through a forward. That is Volatility Managers opinion.
    For information on purchasing reprints of this article, contact sales.
    Copyright 2013 CyberTech, Inc.
     
    Contact The Author
    Email the author
    Phone: 719.687.5414
     
  • Click Here For More Articles on Fossil & Biomass


  • Click Here For More Articles By Thomas Lord
  • Do you agree or disagree with this article? Send in your own article.

     

    Readers Comments

    Date Comment
    Joseph Mathew
    2.25.03
    Another interesting and explanatory article by the author. While risk management and hedging programs are vitally important to strength of balance sheet, the nuances and differences between techniques can make a significant difference in maximizing shareholder value and corporate sustainability. Analytically, futures, forwards, options and swaps can be a complex subject matter, but from an operational and logical framework, they both make good sense and easy to understand. And the author further elucidates this by showing some of the cashflow effects of two "similar" hedging structures.

    The difference in hedging strategy can allow users to customize their hedging needs to their respective situations and critieria. Swaps and options each have thier benefits, but depending on the situation, one may be better specific usage than the other.

    Victor Bush
    2.27.03
    A good logical argument. The problem comes when the accounting department gets involved and makes the argument that FASB 133 creates too many problems for them. Subsequently the idea gets shelved and the company misses an opportunity to hedge their position. A discussion on the best way to interpret and satisfy FASB 133 would be helpful.

    Thomas Lord
    2.27.03
    Victor: I guess that should be the next article - or you can get a physical contract for flow of gas at " index but not to exceed" with an imbedded demand charge and ignore the whole discussion.

    Thomas Lord
    3.4.03
    **This is a comment I received directly and was allowed to post only if no attribution was attached. The comentator works for a major money center bank in their commodity group.***

    I just love when people want to lay off risk but don't want to pay anything for it (cash or margin).

    That's why they should just buy puts and consumers should just buy calls. Just like when they buy insurance for their property and liability risks - managing risk costs money. Either buy the insurance or live with the risk. At least with buying options outright, you know your worst case scenario.

    Seems like some companies forget their priorities. If you can't live with the price swings in the market - you have to find a way to purchase protection.

    jon summerville
    3.4.03
    A costless collar whereby the the consumer of gas buys a call and sells an equal value put is your answer.

    This is costless and locks in a reasonable range of forward prices for someone with a large enough volume that the strikes can be set efficiently.

    Thomas Lord
    3.4.03
    Yes, Jon, but the producers who hedged with "costless" collars this winter saw, in some cases, in excess of 100% margin calls (sell a $4.50 call and have the market go to $11 - this is still very expensive from a cash flow basis). In that case, at 10% money, the "costless" collar can have credit cost of 2 1/2 cents per $1 of margin call per quarter. Therefore, spending 25 cents on a call and not selling the put may had a "range" of actual costs between 25 cents and - for a one year collar - maybe something less than 15 cents, all in cost for the producer. At that point, maybea consumer would reconsider buying the call with all the downside gain - as opposed to the "costless" collar. "Costless" collars aren't costless or riskless - they just require no cash payment.

    The consumer may consider the call purchase a better "certainty equivalent" trade. That is Volatility Manager's advice.

    value@volatilitymanagement.com

    Add your comments:
    Please log in to leave a comment!

    Top

    Sponsored Content
        Home | Register | Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | About Us | Feedback
       Copyright © 2002-2013, CyberTech, Inc. - All rights reserved. Read our Terms of Service.