The second wave of biofuels such as cellulosic ethanol, algae and others bypass the food vs. fuel controversy and are on the cusp of commercialization. This webinar will review the latest developments in the advanced biofuel space with leading companies more...
Join Intelligent Utility managing editor Kate Rowland, along with a panel from PHI including Rob Stewart, manager of technology evaluation and implementation, and Todd McGregor, AMI director, for an interactive discussion about this company's work to build a more intelligent more...
Join industry leaders and Marty Rosenberg, Editor-in-Chief of EnergyBiz magazine, for an interactive discussion about the critical relationship between transmission and distribution (T&D) investment and smart grid success. As the energy enterprise gets smarter toward the consumer end with smart more...
This webcast should be attended by those individuals that are responsible for identifying, planning and evaluating Smart Grid solutions, including those that empower and engage consumers and are easily assimilated with existing or new technology and business processes. more...
ACI's Smart Grid Revolution February 18-19, 2010 A two day strategic event bringing together utility professionals, government & state officials & consultants involved in deployment of the smart grid. To learn strategies which will improve energy efficiency programs & operations, more...
In 2009, a global economic meltdown collided with an energy crisis to turn the world on its ear. In the United States we've witnessed an unprecedented spending on energy resource development and infrastructure. As a result, a new energy architecture more...
CERAWeek, IHS CERA's 29th Executive Conference, is recognized as a leading forum offering insight into the energy future. Each year senior policymakers, energy and power executives, and financial and technology leaders from over 55 countries engage with CERA experts in more...
The conference will provide a comprehensive analysis of the thin film industry and its key challenges in an interactive manner. Leading companies will share their experiences through panel debates and high-level presentations. A great opportunity to network with the whole more...
Gas and Electric Business Understanding provides a comprehensive overview of the natural gas and electric industries. Position yourself for career success by gaining a solid understanding of how each business works, including key physical, market and regulatory aspects, as well more...
Gas Business Understanding provides a comprehensive overview of the natural gas industry. Position yourself for career advancement by gaining a solid understanding of how the gas business works including key physical, market, and regulatory aspects and how market participants navigate more...
Electric Business Understanding provides a comprehensive overview of the electric industry. Position yourself for career advancement by gaining a solid understanding of how the electric business works including key physical, market, and regulatory aspects and how market participants navigate this more...
Gas Market Dynamics offers participants an in-depth understanding of North American natural gas markets and how they function. Enhance your career by furthering your knowledge of market structure, supply and demand, services offered in gas markets, and how various participants more...
We know you have something to say!
There is an immediate need for articles on
the hot topics in the Power Industry!
EnergyPulse, like no other publication,
also provides a means for our readers to
immediately interact with experts like you.
Biomass is the material derived from plants that use sunlight to grow which include plant and animal material such as wood from forests, material left over from agricultural and forestry processes, and organic industrial, human and animal wastes. Biomass comes from a variety of sources which include:
Wood from natural forests and woodlands
Forestry plantations
Forestry residues
Agricultural residues such as straw, stover, cane trash and green agricultural wastes
Agro-industrial wastes, such as sugarcane bagasse and rice husk
Animal wastes
Industrial wastes, such as black liquor from paper manufacturing
Sewage
Municipal solid wastes (MSW)
Food processing wastes
The energy contained in biomass originally came from the sun. Through photosynthesis carbon dioxide in the air is transformed into other carbon containing molecules (e.g., sugars, starches and cellulose) in plants. The chemical energy that is stored in plants and animals (animals eat plants or other animals) or in their waste is called bio-energy.
When biomass is burned it releases its energy, generally in the form of heat. The biomass carbon reacts with oxygen in the air to form carbon dioxide. If fully combusted, the amount of carbon dioxide produced is equal to the amount which was absorbed from the air while the plant was growing.
In nature, if biomass is left lying around on the ground it will break down over a long period of time, releasing carbon dioxide and its store of energy slowly. By burning biomass its store of energy is released quickly and often in a useful way. So converting biomass into useful energy imitates the natural processes but at a faster rate.
Biomass wastes can be transformed into clean energy and/or fuels by a variety of technologies, ranging from conventional combustion process to state-of-the art thermal depolymerization technology. Besides recovery of substantial energy, these technologies can lead to a substantial reduction in the overall waste quantities requiring final disposal, which can be better managed for safe disposal in a controlled manner while meeting the pollution control standards.
Biomass waste-to-energy conversion reduces greenhouse gas emissions in two ways. Heat and electrical energy is generated which reduces the dependence on power plants based on fossil fuels. The greenhouse gas emissions are significantly reduced by preventing methane emissions from landfills. Moreover, waste-to-energy plants are highly efficient in harnessing the untapped sources of energy from wastes.
Conversion Technologies
Biomass energy technology is inherently flexible. The variety of technological options available means that it can be applied at a small, localized scale primarily for heat, or it can be used in much larger base-load power generation capacity while also producing heat. Biomass generation can thus be tailored to rural or urban environments, and utilized in domestic, commercial or industrial applications.
A host of technologies are available for realizing the potential of biomass waste as an energy source, ranging from very simple systems for disposing of dry waste to more complex technologies capable of dealing with large amounts of industrial waste.
Biomass can be converted into energy by simple combustion, by co-firing with other fuels or through some intermediate process such as gasification. The energy produced can be electrical power, heat or both (combined heat and power, or CHP). The advantage of utilizing heat as well as or instead of electrical power is the marked improvement of conversion efficiency -- electrical generation has a typical efficiency of around 30 percent, but if heat is used efficiencies can rise to more than 85 percent.
Biochemical processes, like anaerobic digestion, can also produce clean energy in the form of biogas which can be converted to power and heat using a gas engine. In addition, wastes can also yield liquid fuels, such as cellulosic ethanol, which can be used to replace petroleum-based fuels. Algal biomass is also emerging as a good source of energy because it can serve as natural source of oil, which conventional refineries can transform into jet fuel or diesel fuel.
Major Types of Biomass Waste
Biomass energy projects provide major business opportunities, environmental benefits, and rural development. Feedstocks can be obtained from a wide array of sources without jeopardizing the food and feed supply, forests, and biodiversity in the world.
Agricultural residues -- Crop residues encompasses all agricultural wastes such as bagasse, straw, stem, stalk, leaves, husk, shell, peel, pulp, stubble, etc. Large quantities of crop residues are produced annually worldwide, and are vastly underutilized. Rice produces both straw and rice husks at the processing plant which can be conveniently and easily converted into energy. Significant quantities of biomass remain in the fields in the form of cob when maize is harvested which can be converted into energy. Sugar cane harvesting leads to harvest residues in the fields while processing produces fibrous bagasse, both of which are good sources of energy. Harvesting and processing of coconuts produces quantities of shell and fiber that can be utilized.
Current farming practice is usually to plough these residues back into the soil, or they are burnt, left to decompose, or grazed by cattle. These residues could be processed into liquid fuels or thermochemical processed to produce electricity and heat. Agricultural residues are characterized by seasonal availability and have characteristics that differ from other solid fuels such as wood, charcoal, char briquette. The main differences are the high content of volatile matter and lower density and burning time.
Animal waste -- There are a wide range of animal wastes that can be used as sources of biomass energy. The most common sources are animal and poultry manures. In the past this waste was recovered and sold as a fertilizer or simply spread onto agricultural land, but the introduction of tighter environmental controls on odor and water pollution means that some form of waste management is now required, which provides further incentives for waste-to-energy conversion.
The most attractive method of converting these waste materials to useful form is anaerobic digestion which gives biogas that can be used as a fuel for internal combustion engines, to generate electricity from small gas turbines, burnt directly for cooking, or for space and water heating.
Forestry residues -- Forestry residues are generated by operations such as thinning of plantations, clearing for logging roads, extracting stem-wood for pulp and timber, and natural attrition. Harvesting may occur as thinning in young stands, or cutting in older stands for timber or pulp that also yields tops and branches usable for biomass energy. Harvesting operations usually remove only 25 to 50 percent of the volume, leaving the residues available as biomass for energy.
Stands damaged by insects, disease or fire are additional sources of biomass. Forest residues normally have low density and fuel values that keep transport costs high, and so it is economical to reduce the biomass density in the forest itself.
Wood wastes -- Wood processing industries primarily include sawmilling, plywood, wood panel, furniture, building component, flooring, particle board, moulding, jointing and craft industries. Wood wastes generally are concentrated at the processing factories, e.g., plywood mills and sawmills. The amount of waste generated from wood processing industries varies from one type industry to another depending on the form of raw material and finished product.
Generally, the waste from wood industries such as saw millings and plywood, veneer and others are sawdust, off-cuts, trims and shavings. Sawdust arise from cutting, sizing, re-sawing, edging, while trims and shaving are the consequence of trimming and smoothing of wood. In general, processing of 1,000 kg of wood in the furniture industries will lead to waste generation of almost half (45 percent), i.e., 450 kg of wood. Similarly, when processing 1,000 kg of wood in sawmill, the waste will amount to more than half (52 percent), i.e., 520 kg wood.
Industrial wastes -- The food industry produces a large number of residues and by-products that can be used as biomass energy sources. These waste materials are generated from all sectors of the food industry with everything from meat production to confectionery producing waste that can be utilised as an energy source.
Solid wastes include peelings and scraps from fruit and vegetables, food that does not meet quality control standards, pulp and fibre from sugar and starch extraction, filter sludges and coffee grounds. These wastes are usually disposed of in landfill dumps.
Liquid wastes are generated by washing meat, fruit and vegetables, blanching fruit and vegetables, pre-cooking meats, poultry and fish, cleaning and processing operations as well as wine making.
These waste waters contain sugars, starches and other dissolved and solid organic matter. The potential exists for these industrial wastes to be anaerobically digested to produce biogas, or fermented to produce ethanol, and several commercial examples of waste-to-energy conversion already exist.
Pulp and paper industry is considered to be one of the highly polluting industries and consumes large amount of energy and water in various unit operations. The wastewater discharged by this industry is highly heterogeneous as it contains compounds from wood or other raw materials, processed chemicals as well as compound formed during processing. Black liquor can be judiciously utilized for production of biogas using anaerobic UASB technology.
Municipal solid wastes and sewage -- Millions of tons of household waste are collected each year with the vast majority disposed of in open fields. The biomass resource in MSW comprises the putrescibles, paper and plastic and averages 80 percent of the total MSW collected. Municipal solid waste can be converted into energy by direct combustion, or by natural anaerobic digestion in the engineered landfill. At the landfill sites the gas produced by the natural decomposition of MSW (approximately 50 percent methane and 50 percent carbon dioxide) is collected from the stored material and scrubbed and cleaned before feeding into internal combustion engines or gas turbines to generate heat and power. The organic fraction of MSW can be anaerobically stabilized in a high-rate digester to obtain biogas for electricity or steam generation.
Sewage is a source of biomass energy that is very similar to the other animal wastes. Energy can be extracted from sewage using anaerobic digestion to produce biogas. The sewage sludge that remains can be incinerated or undergo pyrolysis to produce more biogas.The growing use of waste-to-energy technologies as a method for safe disposal of solid and liquid wastes, and as an attractive option to generate heat, power and fuels, has greatly reduced environmental impacts of a wide array of wastes. An environmentally sound and techno-economically viable methodology to treat different classes of waste is highly crucial for the sustainability of modern societies. A transition from conventional energy systems to one based on renewable resources is necessary to meet the ever-increasing demand for energy and to address environmental concerns.
For information on purchasing reprints of this article, contact Tim Tobeck ttobeck@energycentral.com. Copyright 2010 CyberTech, Inc.
Solid biomass wastes can certainly be burned directly or by gasification to raise steam and power steam engines. Enginion of Germany and Schoell Cyclone Power in the USA have developed small reciprocating steam engines that operate on super-critical steam and deliver the efficiency of diesel engines. Several new generation small turbine engines have combustion chambers lined with silicon nitride and turbine wheels made of the same material . . . it is possible to adapt these engines to operate with biomass gasifiers and burn the biogass directly while avoiding the problem of carbon deposits on the turbine.
Much waste biomass can be processed into combustible liquid fuel . . . using the waste heat from existing thermal power stations to sustain the most energy intensive aspect of ethanol production.
Len Gould 8.5.09
I agree with your "An environmentally sound and techno-economically viable methodology to treat different classes of waste is highly crucial for the sustainability of modern societies." -- HIOWEVER, I'm disappointed that you've failed to address the issue of returning minerals from plant material to the soil from where it originated. NO method of exploiting biomass should be considered which does ot also take great care to neither distribute as aerosol waste gas, or contaminate; the phosphorous, potasium and trace minerals required for plant growth contained in the bio-mass. That requiement basically rules out co-firing biomass, especially with coal. Projects which highly centralize the materials are also questionable unless they also include the cost of re-distributing clean ash back to the source soils.
Any alternative is simply "mining the soils", a short-term strategy at best.
Also of interest. U.S. Coal Consumption 2002: 1,060 million short tons (Mmst)
U.S. corn crop 12.68 billion bushels in 2009 (380 Mmst) U.S. soybean crop 3.07 billion bushels in 2009 (92 Mmst) U.S. wheat crop 2.50 billion bushels in 2009 (69 Mmst) Georgia has "theoretically available" 18 Mmst dry forest resource available / yr. Assume all US = 6x that, or U.S. dry forest resource (108 Mmst)
Adding those four (by far the four largest biomass crops produced) provides 649 Mmst. Assume stovers, straws, other crops not counted could double that to 1,300 Mmst. Also assume it requres 2 tons bio-mass to equal 1 ton coal in a boiler, eg 1060 tons coal = 2120 tons biomass. 2,120 - 1,300 = 820 tons missing.
So even if we choose to not eat, feed cattle pigs and chickens, produce any paper or lumber, we would still not be able to substitute present coal consumption with bio-mass.
Your number may vary, but I believe this is in the ballpark.
Richard Vesel 8.5.09
A good summary article! The new fact which I was unaware of before was how much waste is generated by the processing of forestry products for wood and furniture - about 50%.
Pyrolizing this waste creates two useful byproducts - pyrolitic oil, which can be used as a liquid fuel to straight or mix with bunker oil for ships and power plants, and a high-carbon char which can be burned with, or as a substitute for, coal. NewEarth's eCoal is one such product.
Generally, I see gasifiers as being among the best technologies for dealing with all sorts of organic waste materials. This technology is carbon neutral, recycling carbon originating in the biosphere, over and over again. Large-scale gasifier projects need more visibility and support so that they make faster inroads into our energy picture.
Regards, RWVesel
Len Gould 8.5.09
Start building solar thermal NOW. Forget this bio-mass fization.
Ramanathan Menon 8.7.09
Dear Salman:
A well-studied, in-depth and informative article.
Biomass is an important energy source contributing to more than 14% of the global energy supply. About 38% of such energy is consumed in developing countries, primarily in the rural and traditional sectors of the economy. Further, the vast agricultural produce in India also makes available large quantities of agro-residues, which can be used to generate power.
The strong demand for bio-fuel is in response not only to high crude petroleum prices, but also to the growing concerns about global climate change. Two major bio-fuels for the transportation sector, bio-ethanol and bio-diesel have gained worldwide acceptance.
In June 2007, the oil giant Bharat Petroleum signed a US$ 160 million deal with British bio-diesel producer D1 Oils, creating a JV, which will become the world’s largest producer of Jatropha oil by 2011.
Energy efficiency provides a powerful and cost-effective mechanism to achieve a sustainable energy future. Improvements in energy efficiency can reduce the need for investment in energy infrastructure, cut fuel costs, increase competitiveness and improve consumer welfare. Environmental benefits can also be achieved by the reduction of greenhouse gases emissions. Energy security can also benefit from improved energy efficiency by decreasing the reliance on imported fossil fuels.
The mission of the Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE) in India is to 'institutionalize' energy efficiency services, enable delivery mechanisms and provide leadership to energy efficiency in all industrial sectors in the country. The primary objective is to reduce energy intensity in the economy.
Energy efficiency has proven to be a cost-effective strategy for building economies without necessarily growing energy consumption.
It offers a solution to reduce demand while continuing to pursue the goals of economic and environmental sustainability and provides opportunity to free up capital for other social and economical development needs.
Ramanathan Menon
Roger Arnold 8.9.09
Richard,
Pyrolizing this waste creates two useful byproducts - pyrolitic oil, which can be used as a liquid fuel to straight or mix with bunker oil for ships and power plants, and a high-carbon char which can be burned with, or as a substitute for, coal. NewEarth's eCoal is one such product.
High temperature flash pyrolysis, used to produce the "liquified biomass" that you're talking about, does not produce large amounts of char. As I understand it, the char that it does produce is not especially rich in retained mineral nutrients. It has a high content of graphite particles, and is not especially effective as a soil ammendment. That destroys what I consider to be its highest value, for carbon sequestration and improving soil fertility. It can substitute for coal in power plants, but never in anything approaching the quantities needed.
Conversely, the slow low temperature pyrolysis that produces the best agricultural bio-char has a low yield of condensible liquids and tars. Its main condensible liquids are methanol and water (but with significant fractions of turpenes and god knows what else), and its main gaseous products are hydrogen, carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide, with traces of methane.
Len,
Start building solar thermal NOW. Forget this bio-mass fization.
Solar thermal is fine, but bio-mass has a solid place as well. It's storable, and in conjunction with CAES, can provide the short-reaction dispatchable power needed to back wind and solar energy. And bio-char is great for improving soil quality while sequestering carbon.
Peter Boisen 8.11.09
Good article. Agree with Len Gould that it is important to consider the return of nutrients to the soil, thus forming a closed loop system, and avoiding eutrophication problems.
One of the most challenging waste problems is the handling of MSW (municipal solid waste). Although far from being the most significant source of renewable biomass resources it presents a number of challenges.
http://www.avfallsverige.se/m4n?oid=U2009:05 At this web site you can download an English language study prepared in 2008, but issued in May, 2009, concerning European disposal of MSW. The report was prepared by PROFU for Avfall Sverige and provides very interesting information, also listing by country all existing regulations and incentives. A really interested reader will find lots of useful references in this report.
http://www.cmslegal.com/Documents/Cleantech_Report_June2009.pdf Another useful report isssued last month which highlights new possibilities within the renewables sector.
Joel Keller 8.11.09
We have integrated a front-end recycling facility with a back-end pyrolysis to energy technology using specially hardened internal combustion engines driving generator sets. Our process takes single stream MSW and through automated Materials Recycling Facility (MRF) equipment, sorts out 60%+ of the input volume in the form of ferrous metals, aluminum, glass and paper/cardboard. These are sold off to the market. The residues of non-recyclable plastics, food wastes, some cellulosic material and wood are shredded and used as engineered fuel or RDF by a third generation slow pyrolysis system, which produces high BTU syngas consisting mostly of methane, ethane, propane, butane, CO and Hydrogen. The gas stream is scrubbed to eliminate particulates and oil condensates, which are diverted and stored. The gas is then used to fire a specially modified internal combustion engine to drive a generator. The hot exhaust gas is used to maintain the pyrolysis system's operating temperature. We have customers for the oil, the char and the power. We charge a "tipping fee" for receiving the MSW. We sell the recyclables. The process qualifies for "Renewable Energy Certificates" under most RPS mandates. Providing that projects are begun no later than the end of 2010, they each qualify for the 30% Federal Grant in Lieu of the ITC for renewable energy projects. And, if they are sited appropriately, they will also qualify for New Markets Tax Credit monetization.
With some 7 or 8 income streams, cashflow is positive from startup and the ROI for the project is very high.
www.randaenergysolutions.com
Douglas Trerice 8.11.09
Great article and comments! Sooo, why does biomass still have a back seat to wind/solar?
Rinaldo Sorgenti 8.12.09
Very interesting article indeed. About Len Gould comment: "...Projects which highly centralize the materials are also questionable unless they also include the cost of re-distributing clean ash back to the source soils." Yes, it is logically important to return/re-distributing clean ash back to the soil. Which is the problem there ? On the contrary, properly re-distributing this clean ash back to the soil, in a controlled proportion to the soil quality, might help a lot in overcoming various other soil's problems (i.e., improving the capacity of water retention and improving the soil production for many crops).
But a further question come to my mind. It relates to the sentence written at the top of the article: "If fully combusted, the amount of carbon dioxide produced is equal to the amount which was absorbed from the air while the plant was growing.". O.K. but, considering that the energy derived from burning the biomass is significantly lower than burning fossil fuels, so the amount of carbon dioxide is more than double for the same amount of electricity produced by burning fossil fuels, which is the advantage in term of GHG total emissions to the atmosphere?
It would not be better and wise to avoid burning this biomass for energy production and instead burying it underground? Finally, nature took 20-30 years to capture and storage the CO2 insite plants and instead of making use of this natural effort to reduce CO2 from the air, we promote the return of same to the atmosphere as a replacement from other fossil fuels (primarily coal) which give a much better energy return. Some might object that, finally, burying the biomass will only delay the time when such biomass constituents comes back to the atmosphere anyway. Right, but we just need to look at the involved time frame. A conventional coal power plant has an operational lifetime of about 30-40 years, after which it might be possible that science is able to discover and put in place new forms of energy which do not originate the claimed huge amount of GHG. In that time frame, there would be very little concern about the direct return to the atmosphere of the biomass constituents mentioned above.
Finally, we should not discriminate any form of conventional or new energy sources; we need all of them, combined in an intelligent ratio, depending on place to place, technologies availability, level of the economic developments, etc. Even RES need to be considered without loosing sight of the cost-efficiency ratio and this is the "natural" complement to the most intelligent and diversified "Fuel Mix" of the most industrialised countries, like USA, Germany, Japan, Spain, etc. etc.. Unfortunately not yet for Italy (my loved country) where, the "pseudo-ambientalists" are exagerating to over-emphasize the importance of RES, without any consideration to their related cost-efficiency ratio. So, we surprisingly burn "imported" methane (up to about 60% of our electricity production), using the most costly of fuels and then highly subvent by incentives the development of Solar PV and WIND turbines (in a country hopefully not particularly windy!), while paying electricity abt 35% more than all our competitors in Europe!
The better form of energy is intelligence, while speculations often indulge towards climate change arguments and RES. A very different sort of "science"!
bill payne 8.12.09
We're concerned that more energy may be expended collecting biomass than is produced by biomass.
EROEI for different forms of biomass?
Albuquerque Journal published Wednesday August 11, 2009
"[N]ow, Brown argues, those trends in growing population and increasing energy use. are hurtling headlong toward fundamental global limits. If we do not reduce our population growth and our per capita energy consumption, we'll burn through the last of our fossil fuels; triggering devastating climate change and, when the fuels run out, societal collapse. ..."
The USA has 300 years of domestic coal reserves, 100+ years of domestic natural gas reserves, and ?30 years of phosphorous fertilizer reserves.
"The U.S. is the world’s second-largest producer of phosphorus (after China), at 19 percent of the total, but 65 percent of that amount comes from a single source: pit mines near Tampa, Fla., which may not last more than a few decades. Meanwhile nearly 40 percent of global reserves are controlled by a single country, Morocco, sometimes referred to as the “Saudi Arabia of phosphorus.” Although Morocco is a stable, friendly nation, the imbalance makes phosphorus a geostrategic ticking time bomb." - Scientific American June 2009 - Phosphorus Famine: The Threat to Our Food Supply
Given that whole nations will starve a LOT faster for lack of phosphorous rather than lack of oil I fail to understand the complacency. Note the one commentor's post regarding the unexploited phosphorous resource in Iraq? That's a new thought.
Len Gould 8.17.09
Joel Keller - "We have customers for ... the char" -- I surely hope that "char" is not being spread on soils, unless you're doing something to remove the heavy metals and other nasties. I know, a bunch of you are going to ignore that as just another eco-freak comment, but I'm not, really. I'm just growing increasingly concerned about the cavilier way we treat the only spaceship we know of which can support our species. I'm typically 10 to 15 years ahead of the pack on concerns like that, and very rational in response.