Energy Central EnergyPulse Home
Home Subscribe Login Contribute to Energy Pulse Advertise on Energy Pulse About Energy Pulse Feedback to Energy Pulse
Search Articles:   
  You are here: Home > Fossil & Biomass > Article Display


Free Newsletter
Sign up today for your free subscription to the EnergyPulse Weekly Update - delivered directly to your e-mail box.
e-mail:


 

Communicating Smart Meter Value

Sep 9 2010 - 2010-01-01 12:00:00 - Your City

If you are involved in Management or Customer Service and are responsible for communicating the value of smart meters to your utility customers, you don’t want to miss this online discussion - Communicating Smart Meter Value.  more...

Social Media: The new frontier in recruiting, communications and marketing

Sep 13 2010 - 2010-01-01 12:00:00 - Your City

Join social media mavens Matthew Burks and Amanda Shewmake as they provide an insider's perspective on how HR, communications and marketing professionals in energy companies can harness the power of social media to be more effective and productive. more...

Eliminating Obstacles and Delivering the Benefits of the Smart Grid - IBM's Optimized Energy Value Chain (OEVC)

Sep 14 2010 - 2010-01-01 12:00:00 - Your City

The convergence of power and information technologies in the smart grid has created opportunities for finer grained and broader controls of energy flows. These opportunities can improve electric service in multiple dimensions: lower cost, greater reliability, greater customer satisfaction, and more...

Achieving Operational Excellence - What to Consider Before Implementing or Upgrading Your Distribution Management Solutions

Sep 16 2010 - 2010-01-01 12:00:00 - Your City

Significant cost over runs. Changing business requirements. A well thought out plan is essential. Attend this free webcast discussion to hear inside hear three experts in utility operations discuss what utilities need to evaluate when they are considering upgrading or more...

Outsmarting the Smart Grid: IT, Security and Communication Infrastructure  Challenges & Opportunities for Utilities

Sep 21 2010 - 2010-01-01 12:00:00 - Your City

The smart grid is shifting the playing field for utilities. And when the game changes, it pays to be prepared. A nimble solutions partner can help you design the solutions that keep operations on track, even as new challenges come more...

1st CSP Today Concentrated Solar Thermal Power Summit India

Sep 7 2010 - Sep 8 2010 - New Delhi India

Deliver a profitable, productive and commercially successful large scale CSP business in India. Building on the success of past events in USA, Europe & MENA, CSP Today brings to New Delhi the most relevant international experience for the concentrated solar more...

Offshore Wind Energy in North America's Great Lakes Conference

Sep 9 2010 - Sep 10 2010 - Toronto

Two day conference that tackles the most important challenges. A blend of European knowledge from the companies who have been installing offshore wind turbines for the last decade alongside local state governing bodies and leading project developers. Permitting, securing long more...

Autovation 2010

Sep 12 2010 - Sep 15 2010 - Austin, TX - USA

Autovation 2010 is a not-to-miss educational forum that will attract utility executives from around the world looking for new ways to optimize their operations through automation technologies. more...

Global Sustainable Bioenergy North American Convention

Sep 14 2010 - Sep 16 2010 - Minneapolis, MN - USA

The North American convention provides a remarkable opportunity to play a part in guiding renewable energy policy for the 21st century. Attendees will create a resolution that, along with similar resolutions already drafted on four other continents, will help set more...

GridWise Global Forum

Sep 21 2010 - Sep 23 2010 - Washington, DC - USA

Hosted by the GridWise(R) Alliance and the U.S. Department of Energy, the GridWise Global Forum will convene thought leaders from the highest levels of government, business, NGOS, and academia from around the world to discuss the ultimate enabling potential of more...

1. Intro to Nat Gas Trading & Hedging 2. Option Applications in Energy

Sep 20 2010 - Sep 23 2010 - Houston, TX - USA

Introduction to Natural Gas Trading & Hedging - This program provides a comprehensive understanding of the structures that underlie Natural Gas trading. Beyond Essentials: Option Applications in Energy - This course provides a solid practical and conceptual (non-quantitative) understanding of more...

Electric Business Understanding Seminar

Sep 20 2010 - Sep 21 2010 - Houston, TX - USA

Electric Business Understanding provides a comprehensive overview of the electric industry. Position yourself for career advancement by gaining a solid understanding of how the electric business works including key physical, market, and regulatory aspects and how market participants navigate this more...

Electric Market Dynamics Seminar

Sep 22 2010 - Sep 23 2010 - Houston, TX - USA

Electric Market Dynamics offers participants an in-depth understanding of North American electric markets and how they function. Enhance your career by furthering your knowledge of market structures, pricing mechanisms, services offered in markets, and how various participants use the markets more...

Gas and Electric Business Understanding Seminar

Oct 5 2010 - Oct 6 2010 - Los Angeles, CA - USA

Gas and Electric Business Understanding provides a comprehensive overview of the natural gas and electric industries. Position yourself for career success by gaining a solid understanding of how each business works, including key physical, market and regulatory aspects, as well more...

Energy Central
Power Network




Fossil & Biomass


We know you have something to say!
There is an immediate need for articles on the hot topics in the Power Industry! EnergyPulse, like no other publication, also provides a means for our readers to immediately interact with experts like you.
 
Contribute Today!
Please view our Author Guidelines and send submissions to the editor.

Click For More Articles on Fossil & Biomass
 
Gasification of Municipal Solid Waste
6.3.09   Salman Zafar, Renewable Energy Advisor, BioEnergy Consult

Article Viewed 5386 Times
11 Comments
E-mail Article Printer Friendly
 
  • Email This Author
  • Comment On Article
  • About The Author
  • More Articles By This Author

    The enormous increase in the quantity and diversity of waste materials and their potentially harmful effects on the general environment and public health have led to an increasing awareness about an urgent need to adopt scientific methods for safe disposal of wastes. While there is an obvious need to minimize the generation of wastes and to reuse and recycle them, the technologies for recovery of energy from wastes can play a vital role in mitigating the problems. These technologies can lead to a substantial reduction in the overall waste quantities requiring final disposal, which can be better managed for safe disposal while meeting the pollution control standards.

    Waste-to-energy plants based on gasification are high-efficiency power plants that utilize municipal solid waste as their fuel rather than conventional sources of energy like coal, oil or natural gas. Such plants recover the thermal energy contained in the garbage in highly efficient boilers that generate steam that can then be sold directly to industrial customers, or used on-site to drive turbines for electricity production. The recovery of energy from solid wastes offers several benefits which include:

    • Substantial reduction in the total quantity of waste depending upon the waste composition and the adopted technology.
    • Significant reduction in environmental pollution.
    • Improvement in the quality of residual waste.
    • Reduction in the demand for land for waste disposal.
    • Reduction in transport cost, as garbage is not required to be carried to a far-away place for dumping.
    • Improved commercial viability of the waste disposal project from the sale of energy/products.
    Gasification

    Gasification processes involve the reaction of carbonaceous feedstock with an oxygen-containing reagent, usually oxygen, air, steam or carbon dioxide, generally at temperatures in excess of 800 degrees C. It involves the partial oxidation of a substance which implies that oxygen is added but the amounts are not sufficient to allow the fuel to be completely oxidized and full combustion to occur. The process is largely exothermic but some heat may be required to initialize and sustain the gasification process.

    The main product is a syngas, which contains carbon monoxide, hydrogen and methane. Typically, the gas generated from gasification will have a net calorific value of 4 to 10 MJ/Nm3. The other main product produced by gasification is a solid residue of non-combustible materials (ash) which contains a relatively low level of carbon. Syngas can be used in a number of different ways, for example:

    • Syngas can be burned in a boiler to generate steam which may be used for power generation or industrial heating.
    • Syngas can be used as a fuel in a dedicated gas engine.
    • Syngas, after reforming, may be suitable for use in a gas turbine.
    • Syngas can also be used as a chemical feedstock.
    Gasification plants, based on syngas production, are relatively small scale, flexible to different inputs and modular development. Producing syngas to serve multiple end-uses could complicate delivery of the plants but it could provide a higher degree of financial security.

    Gasification of Municipal Solid Waste

    The most important reason for the growing popularity of thermal processes for the treatment of solid wastes has been the increasing technical, environmental and public dissatisfaction with the performance of conventional incineration processes. MSW is difficult to handle, segregate and feed in a controlled manner to a waste-to-energy facility. MSW has a high tendency to form fused ash deposits on the internal surfaces of furnaces and high temperature reactors, and to form bonded fouling deposits on heat exchanger surfaces. The products of the combustion of MSW are also very aggressive, in that the flue gases are erosive and the relatively high levels of chloride containing species in the flue gases can lead to high rates of metal wastage of heat exchange tube surfaces due to high temperature corrosion.

    While evaluating gasification or other thermal technologies, the degree of pre-processing required in conversion of MSW into a suitable feed material is a major criterion. Unsorted MSW is not suitable for most thermal technologies because of its varying composition and size of some of its constituent materials. It may also contain undesirable materials which can play havoc with the process or emission control systems.

    The main steps involved in pre-processing of MSW include manual and mechanical separation or sorting, shredding, grinding, blending with other materials, drying and pelletization. The purpose of pre-processing is to produce a feed material with consistent physical characteristics and chemical properties. Pre-processing operations are also designed to produce a material that can be safely handled, transported and stored.



    Figure 1: Schematic of MSW Gasification and Power Generation Plant

    Advantages of Gasification

    There are numerous solid waste gasification facilities operating or under construction around the world. Gasification has several advantages over traditional combustion processes for MSW treatment. It takes place in a low-oxygen environment that limits the formation of dioxins and of large quantities of SOx and NOx. Furthermore, it requires just a fraction of the stoichiometric amount of oxygen necessary for combustion. As a result, the volume of process gas is low, requiring smaller and less expensive gas cleaning equipment. The lower gas volume also means a higher partial pressure of contaminants in the off-gas, which favours more complete adsorption and particulate capture. Finally, gasification generates a fuel gas that can be integrated with combined cycle turbines, reciprocating engines and, potentially, with fuel cells that convert fuel energy to electricity more efficiently than conventional steam boilers.

    Disadvantages of Gasification

    During gasification, tars, heavy metals, halogens and alkaline compounds are released within the product gas and can cause environmental and operational problems. Tars are high molecular weight organic gases that ruin reforming catalysts, sulfur removal systems, and ceramic filters and increase the occurrence of slagging in boilers and on other metal and refractory surfaces. Alkalis can increase agglomeration in fluidized beds that are used in some gasification systems and also can ruin gas turbines during combustion. Heavy metals are toxic and accumulate if released into the environment. Halogens are corrosive and are a cause of acid rain if emitted to the environment. The key to achieving cost- efficient, clean energy recovery from municipal solid waste gasification will be overcoming problems associated with the release and formation of these contaminants.

    Types of Gasifiers for MSW Treatment

    Gasification technology is selected on the basis of available fuel quality, capacity range, and gas quality conditions. The main reactors used for gasification of MSW are fixed beds and fluidized beds. Larger capacity gasifiers are preferable for treatment of MSW because they allow for variable fuel feed, uniform process temperatures due to highly turbulent flow through the bed, good interaction between gases and solids, and high levels of carbon conversion. shows the thermal capacity ranges for the main gasifier designs.

    Gasifier Design Fuel Capacity
    Downdraft 1 kW - 1MW
    Updraft 1.1 MW - 12 MW
    Bubbling fluidized bed 1 MW - 50 MW
    Circulating fluidized bed 10 MW - 200 MW

    Fixed Beds -- Fixed bed gasifiers typically have a grate to support the feed material and maintain a stationary reaction zone. They are relatively easy to design and operate, and are therefore useful for small- and medium- scale power and thermal energy uses. The two primary types of fixed bed gasifiers are updraft and downdraft.

    In a downdraft gasifier, air is introduced into a downward flowing packed bed or solid fuel stream and gas is drawn off at the bottom. The air/oxygen and fuel enter the reaction zone from above decomposing the combustion gases and burning most of the tars. Downdraft gasifiers are not ideal for waste treatment because they typically require a low- ash fuel such as wood, to avoid clogging.

    In an updraft gasifier, the fuel is also fed at the top of the gasifier but the airflow is in the upward direction. As the fuel flows downward through the vessel it dries, pyrolyzes, gasifies and combusts. The main use of updraft gasifiers has been with direct use of the gas in a closely coupled boiler or furnace. Because the gas leaves this gasifier at relatively low temperatures, the process has a high thermal efficiency and, as a result, wet MSW containing 50 percent moisture can be gasified without any pre-drying of the waste.

    Slagging fixed bed gasifier, which is high-pressure and oxygen-injected, has commercial potential for gasifying MSW. In theory, the high temperatures crack all tars and other volatiles into non-condensable, light gases. Also under these conditions, the ash becomes molten and is tapped out, as is done in iron blast furnaces.

    Fluidized Beds -- Fluidized beds are an attractive proposition for the gasification of MSW. In a fluidized bed boiler, a stream of gas (typically air or steam) is passed upward through a bed of solid fuel and material (such as coarse sand or limestone). The gas acts as the fluidizing medium and also provides the oxidant for combustion and tar cracking. Waste is introduced either on top of the bed through a feed chute or into the bed through an auger. Fluidized -beds have the advantage of extremely good mixing and high heat transfer, resulting in very uniform bed conditions and efficient reactions. Fluidized bed technology is more suitable for generators with capacities greater than 10 MW because it can be used with different fuels, requires relatively compact combustion chambers and allows for good operational control. The two main types of fluidized beds for power generation are bubbling and circulating fluidized beds.

    In a Bubbling Fluidized Bed (BFB), the gas velocity must be high enough so that the solid particles, comprising the bed material, are lifted, thus expanding the bed and causing it to bubble like a liquid. A bubbling fluidized bed reactor typically has a cylindrical or rectangular chamber designed so that contact between the gas and solids facilitates drying and size reduction (attrition). As waste is introduced into the bed, most of the organics vaporize pyrolytically and are partially combusted in the bed. Typical desired operating temperatures range from 900 degrees C to 1000 degrees C.

    A circulating fluidized bed (CFB) is differentiated from a bubbling fluid bed in that there is no distinct separation between the dense solids zone and the dilute solids zone. The capacity to process different feedstock with varying compositions and moisture contents is a major advantage in such systems.

    Emerging Trends

    Gasification with pure oxygen or hydrogen
    Gasification with pure oxygen or pure hydrogen (or hydrogasification) may provide better alternatives to the air blown or indirectly heated gasification systems. This depends greatly on reducing the costs associated with oxygen and hydrogen production and improvements in refractory linings in order to handle higher temperatures. Pure oxygen could be used to generate higher temperatures, and thus promote thermal catalytic destruction of organics within the fuel gas. Hydrogasification is an attractive proposition because it effectively cracks tars within the primary gasifying vessel. It also promotes the formation of a methane- rich gas that can be piped to utilities without any modifications to existing pipelines or gas turbines, and can be reformed into hydrogen or methanol for use with fuel cells.

    Plasma gasification
    Plasma gasification or plasma discharge uses extremely high temperatures in an oxygen-starved environment to completely decompose input waste material into very simple molecules in a process similar to pyrolysis. The heat source is a plasma discharge torch, a device that produces a very high temperature plasma gas. Plasma gasification has two variants, depending on whether the plasma torch is within the main waste conversion reactor or external to it. It is carried out under oxygen-starved conditions and the main products are vitrified slag, syngas and molten metal. Vitrified slag may be used as an aggregate in construction; the syngas may be used in energy recovery systems or as a chemical feedstock; and the molten metal may have a commercial value depending on quality and market availability.

    Thermal depolymerization
    Such processes use high-energy microwaves in a nitrogen atmosphere to decompose waste material. The waste absorbs microwave energy, increasing the internal energy of the organic material to a level where chemical decomposition occurs on a molecular level. The nitrogen blanket forms an inert, oxygen-free environment to prevent combustion. Temperatures in the chamber range from 150 degrees C to 350 degrees C. At these temperatures, metal, ceramics and glass are not chemically affected.

    Conclusion

    A solution to the waste problems confronted by municipalities requires a strategy that integrates several technologies including waste reduction, recycling, landfilling and waste-to-energy. Waste-to-energy, which converts the non-recyclable and combustible portion of the waste to electricity, reduces the amount of materials sent to landfills, prevents air/water contamination, improves recycling rates and lessens the dependence on fossil fuels for power generation. Another area that would increase the viability of waste gasification is the improvement of waste sorting and pre-treatment methods. Preparation of a homogenous RDF remains one of the most difficult tasks in thermochemical conversion of solid waste. It involves a large amount of mechanical processing and close supervision, which greatly impact operating costs and can account for as much as 40 percent of the total plant capital costs. If shredding and sorting of the waste can be made simpler and more effective, gasification would become even more advantageous. Similarly, waste gasification will be most successful in communities where there is good recycling practice. A better job of recycling glass and food wastes by city residents will improve the gasification reactions.

    For information on purchasing reprints of this article, contact Tim Tobeck ttobeck@energycentral.com.
    Copyright 2010 CyberTech, Inc.
     
    Contact The Author
    Email the author
    Phone: +91-9897272022
    E-mail Article Printer Friendly
     
  • Click Here For More Articles on Fossil & Biomass


  • Click Here For More Articles By Salman Zafar
  • Do you agree or disagree with this article? Send in your own article.

     

    Readers Comments

    Date Comment
    Colin Covington
    6.3.09
    I concur with your conclusions. If this country adopted policies to encourage the use of MSW-derived fuels for gasification and other forms of WTE, we would improve air qulity, improve groundwater quality, greatly reduce GHG emissions, improve MSW management economics and profitabilities for private companies, create jobs at a rate of 4 to 1 versus landfilling, improve recycling percentages, increase landfill life expectancies, and make dramatic strides toward energy independence. If you assume that 100 gallons of ethanol could be produced by conversion of the syngas from a ton of appropriately sorted and sized RDF, then we could calculate that 20 billion gallons of ethanol could be produced by diverting 50% of the MSW currently going into landfills. That's about 5 times more than the current production from corn. Unfortunately, the current version of the House Climate Change bill, H.R. 2454, specifically excludes MSW from the "biomass" definition. Elsewhere in the bill, the "non-fossil biogenic portion" of other materials are presumed to be biomass, and that should also be the case for MSW in Section 610 of the bill, which attempts to create a new defninition for biomass. If this definition can be fixed, so that the "non-fossil biogenic" portion of MSW is considered to be biomass, the national policies would support development of technologies that could accomplish all the afore-mentioned objectives in very short order. Ironically, much of the opposition to the use of MSW in any form comes from environmental groups that see WTE as a threat to recycling. In fact, as this article states, no waste conversion technology is going to be efficient unless a great deal of effort is placed on preparing the feedstock on the front end of the process. The same is true for traditional recycling, i.e., one must go to a lot of trouble and expense to produce a good product, and that makes WTE and recycling good bedfellows. WTE, particularly gasification or pyrolysis, allows for a new commodity (fuel feedstock) to be added to the list of other commodities (cardboard, plastic, etc.) so that the economics of the overall process are improved.

    Len Gould
    6.4.09
    It would be less disruptive to toss a live grenade into a municiple council meeting than to raise the issue of incineration of solid waste....just saying. The problem is not technical.

    D. Andrew Owens
    6.9.09
    How do you get 100 gallons of ethanol (about 660 lbs) from syngas produced from one ton of trash (2,000 lbs)? That high level of conversion doesn't seem physically possible.

    Peter Boisen
    6.9.09
    I miss a discussion of the moisture contents in the MSW. With a high moisture content, and with a low content of lignocellulosic matter, AD fermentation would probably be more efficient than gasification. But, regardless of processing method the MSW represents a valuable source of energy.

    Don Hirschberg
    6.9.09
    Owens, Point well taken. Even using corn kernels you get about 300 # of ethanol per ton. Trash would yield far, far less.

    Don Hirschberg
    6.9.09
    Oops, typo. Make that 600 # of ethanlol.

    Peter Belmonte, P.E.
    6.9.09
    Yes it is possible, in fact you can get as much as 150 + gallons of ethanol/methanol from each ton of solid waste with plasma gasification. The syngas produced in the gasifier is partially quenched and then a wet scrubber is used to remove acid gases from the syngas stream. Thus, the syngas picks up mass and volume of water. This article does not go into complete detail of the gasification process and subsequent syngas production leading up to the production of ethanol/methanol.

    Don Hirschberg
    6.9.09
    Peter, I am a skeptic. You are suggesting 50% by weight of ethanol pound for pound from trash. Can you provide some numbers? Some thermodynamics?

    Peter Belmonte, P.E.
    6.10.09
    All I can say Don is that this has been permitted previously. I cannot get into the details due to it's proprietary information, however, the permit I am referring to states that with a feedstock of 300 tons per day of MSW the prodiuction of ethanol is 53,000 gallons/day. There are a couple of companies out there that I am aware of that have this technology. This technology is being closely looked at not only as another source of energy production, but it can extend the life of landfills as it reduces the waste to about 10% of it's initial volume. WM jrecently entered into a joint venture called S4 Energy Solutions which was announced last month.

    Len Gould
    6.15.09
    Don: Perhaps the 50% by weight was a calculation based on "weight of dry matter" ?

    Don Hirschberg
    6.15.09
    Len, Maybe so, but those calories on our food and beverage packages are not on dry matter. Nor when we see a coal's heating value it is not on an ash and moisture free basis but on a guts feathers and all basis unless stated otherwise.

    But even moisture-free I remain a skeptic.

    Add your comments:
    Please log in to leave a comment!

    Top

        Home | Register | Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | About Us | Feedback
       Copyright © 2002-2010, CyberTech, Inc. - All rights reserved. Read our Terms of Service.